Table 4.

Mediating effect of perceived leader generativity in the relationship between perceived leader competence and employee conflict involvement as a function of leader age (Study 2)

PredictorBSEp95% CI
LLUL
Dependent variable: Leader generativity (T2)
Leader competence (T1)0.590.13<0.0010.340.85
Leader age (T1)0.530.330.11−0.121.10
Leader competence × leader age0.260.120.030.050.44
Simple slopes
 Leader ageBBootSEBoot 95% CI
 Young0.340.140.070.60
 Average0.590.140.320.86
 Old0.840.220.411.27
Dependent variable: Employee conflict involvement (T2)
Leader generativity (T2)−0.250.080.001−0.37−0.12
Leader competence (T1)−0.130.090.13−0.29−0.004
Conditional indirect effects
MediatorLeader ageBBootSEBoot 95% CI
Leader generativity (T2)Young−0.080.04−0.16−0.01
Average−0.150.06−0.24−0.05
Old−0.210.08−0.35−0.07
Conditional total effects
 Young−0.220.09−0.38−0.09
Average−0.280.08−0.44−0.16
Old−0.350.10−0.52−0.20

Note(s):

T1 stands for Time 1 and T2 stands for Time 2. Unstandardized coefficients are reported. Perceived leader competence was measured on a 7-point scale: 1 = Not at all, 7 = To a great extent. Leader age was assessed in years; young, average, and old refer to −1SD, mean, and +1SD of age. Employee conflict involvement was assessed on a 7-point scale: 1 = Never, 7 = Very often. Leader generativity was assessed on a 7-point scale: 1 = Does not apply at all, 7 = Applies completely

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal