Table 2 Key results of EFA analysis and...

Table 2

Key results of EFA analysis and construct assessment in PLS-SEM

Items	E-L	C-L	I-L	Alpha	AVE	rho_A
OA1	0.84	0.88	0.94
OA2	0.84	0.85	0.92	0.96	0.86	0.96
OA3	0.83	0.87	0.93
OA4	0.83	0.86	0.92
OA5	0.83	0.87	0.93
EA1	0.90	0.84	0.93
EA2	0.90	0.89	0.95	0.93	0.82	0.97
EA3	0.87	0.74	0.80
EA4	0.85	0.87	0.94
ADA1	0.90	0.93	0.96
ADA2	0.90	0.93	0.96	0.98	0.93	0.98
ADA3	0.89	0.94	0.97
ADA4	0.89	0.92	0.96
ADA5	0.88	0.93	0.96
ADO1	0.87	0.92	0.96
ADO2	0.85	0.90	0.95	0.98	0.93	0.98
ADO3	0.85	0.95	0.97
ADO4	0.85	0.93	0.96
ADO5	0.83	0.93	0.97
SA1	0.84	0.79	0.88
SA2	0.84	0.78	0.88
SA3	0.82	0.82	0.90	0.96	0.79	0.96
SA4	0.82	0.82	0.89
SA5	0.81	0.79	0.88
SA6	0.81	0.81	0.90
SA7	0.81	0.82	0.90
SA8	0.79	0.79	0.89
PI1	0.86	0.93	0.96
PI2	0.86	0.95	0.98	0.98	0.94	0.98
PI3	0.85	0.95	0.97
PI4	0.85	0.94	0.97

Items	E-L	C-L	I-L	Alpha	AVE	rho_A
OA1	0.84	0.88	0.94
OA2	0.84	0.85	0.92	0.96	0.86	0.96
OA3	0.83	0.87	0.93
OA4	0.83	0.86	0.92
OA5	0.83	0.87	0.93
EA1	0.90	0.84	0.93
EA2	0.90	0.89	0.95	0.93	0.82	0.97
EA3	0.87	0.74	0.80
EA4	0.85	0.87	0.94
ADA1	0.90	0.93	0.96
ADA2	0.90	0.93	0.96	0.98	0.93	0.98
ADA3	0.89	0.94	0.97
ADA4	0.89	0.92	0.96
ADA5	0.88	0.93	0.96
ADO1	0.87	0.92	0.96
ADO2	0.85	0.90	0.95	0.98	0.93	0.98
ADO3	0.85	0.95	0.97
ADO4	0.85	0.93	0.96
ADO5	0.83	0.93	0.97
SA1	0.84	0.79	0.88
SA2	0.84	0.78	0.88
SA3	0.82	0.82	0.90	0.96	0.79	0.96
SA4	0.82	0.82	0.89
SA5	0.81	0.79	0.88
SA6	0.81	0.81	0.90
SA7	0.81	0.82	0.90
SA8	0.79	0.79	0.89
PI1	0.86	0.93	0.96
PI2	0.86	0.95	0.98	0.98	0.94	0.98
PI3	0.85	0.95	0.97
PI4	0.85	0.94	0.97

Note(s): E-L, EFA indicator loading; C-L, Communities extraction loading; I-L, Indicator loadings in the PLS-SEM analysis; AVE, average variance extracted value; alpha, Cronbach’s alpha value; rho_A, composite reliability rho_A value

Source(s): Authors' own work

[ViewLarge]