Table 1 Summary of identified network... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1

Summary of identified network influences

Actors/Nodes		Interdependence			Public administration practice	References
Node 1	Node 2	Relationship driver(s)	Direction of the relationship	Flow of authority across the relationship	Public administration practice	References
Society	Micro-municipal Administration	● Higher unemployment ● Lower fiscal pressure ● Higher per capita income	Negative	Command and control	Financial management	Lara-Rubio et al. (2022)
		● Poverty reduction ● Connections with towns	Positive	Command and control	Urban regeneration	Tang et al. (2023)
		● Higher population ● Lower unemployment	Positive	Command and control	Transparency	Zagrapan and Spáč (2022)
Stakeholders	Micro-municipal Administration	● Highly complete and formalised interlocal agreements	Positive	Concession and compromise	Inter-administrative relationships	Previtali (2015) Yi et al. (2018) Zhang and Holzer (2020)
		● Mandatory inter-municipal cooperation (IMC)	Positive	Concession and compromise	Inter-administrative relationships	Giacomini et al. (2018)
		● Stakeholder participation in local development	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Urban regeneration	Sara and Saputra (2021) Vitálišová et al. (2021)
		● Community leadership	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Inter-administrative relationships	Steenbergen (2016) Liu and Han (2023)
Residents	Micro-municipal Administration	● Public assemblies and forums	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Financial management	Jayawarsa et al. (2021) Sonbay et al. (2022)
		● Micro-municipal elections	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Public service commitment	Tan and Qiushui (2007)
		● Collective self-governance	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Urban regeneration	Kondratyev and Fadeeva (2021) Zhang et al. (2022)
Administrators	Micro-municipal Administration and Stakeholders	● Family support ● Cooperative working environment ● Female municipal leadership	Positive	Concession and compromise	Transparency	Pamungkas et al. (2020), Benito et al. (2021), Zagrapan and Spáč (2022)
		● Public service motivation	Positive	Concession and compromise	Public service commitment	Liu et al. (2022)
		● Appointing public volunteer board	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Public service commitment	Dougherty and Easton (2011)
Micro-municipal Administration	Stakeholders	● Good administration principles	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Inter-administrative relationships	Zaitul et al. (2023)
		● Designing of micro-municipal regulations	Negative	Command and control	Inter-administrative relationships	Fatimah et al. (2023)
		● Adopting tailored policies	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Urban regeneration	Pera (2021), Xiao et al. (2022)
Micro-municipal Administration	Residents	● Management efficiency ● Low voter turnout ● Low corruption levels	Positive	Concession and compromise	Transparency	Beeri et al. (2019) Benito et al. (2021), Sofyani et al. (2023)
Micro-municipal Administration	Residents	● Negotiable administration	Positive	Concession and compromise	Urban regeneration	Kasymova and Schachter (2014) Hidayat et al. (2019) Zhang et al. (2019) Annahar et al. (2023)

Actors/Nodes		Interdependence			Public administration practice	References
Node 1	Node 2	Relationship driver(s)	Direction of the relationship	Flow of authority across the relationship	Public administration practice	References
Society	Micro-municipal Administration	● Higher unemployment ● Lower fiscal pressure ● Higher per capita income	Negative	Command and control	Financial management	Lara-Rubio et al. (2022)
		● Poverty reduction ● Connections with towns	Positive	Command and control	Urban regeneration	Tang et al. (2023)
		● Higher population ● Lower unemployment	Positive	Command and control	Transparency	Zagrapan and Spáč (2022)
Stakeholders	Micro-municipal Administration	● Highly complete and formalised interlocal agreements	Positive	Concession and compromise	Inter-administrative relationships	Previtali (2015)Yi et al. (2018)Zhang and Holzer (2020)
		● Mandatory inter-municipal cooperation (IMC)	Positive	Concession and compromise	Inter-administrative relationships	Giacomini et al. (2018)
		● Stakeholder participation in local development	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Urban regeneration	Sara and Saputra (2021)Vitálišová et al. (2021)
		● Community leadership	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Inter-administrative relationships	Steenbergen (2016)Liu and Han (2023)
Residents	Micro-municipal Administration	● Public assemblies and forums	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Financial management	Jayawarsa et al. (2021)Sonbay et al. (2022)
		● Micro-municipal elections	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Public service commitment	Tan and Qiushui (2007)
		● Collective self-governance	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Urban regeneration	Kondratyev and Fadeeva (2021)Zhang et al. (2022)
Administrators	Micro-municipal Administration and Stakeholders	● Family support ● Cooperative working environment ● Female municipal leadership	Positive	Concession and compromise	Transparency	Pamungkas et al. (2020), Benito et al. (2021), Zagrapan and Spáč (2022)
		● Public service motivation	Positive	Concession and compromise	Public service commitment	Liu et al. (2022)
		● Appointing public volunteer board	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Public service commitment	Dougherty and Easton (2011)
Micro-municipal Administration	Stakeholders	● Good administration principles	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Inter-administrative relationships	Zaitul et al. (2023)
		● Designing of micro-municipal regulations	Negative	Command and control	Inter-administrative relationships	Fatimah et al. (2023)
		● Adopting tailored policies	Positive	Collaboration and cooperation	Urban regeneration	Pera (2021), Xiao et al. (2022)
Micro-municipal Administration	Residents	● Management efficiency ● Low voter turnout ● Low corruption levels	Positive	Concession and compromise	Transparency	Beeri et al. (2019)Benito et al. (2021), Sofyani et al. (2023)
Micro-municipal Administration	Residents	● Negotiable administration	Positive	Concession and compromise	Urban regeneration	Kasymova and Schachter (2014)Hidayat et al. (2019)Zhang et al. (2019)Annahar et al. (2023)

Source(s): Authors’ own elaboration