The results of the measurement model
| Variable and items | Code | Loadings | α | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succession planning (SP) | 0.962 | 0.963 | 0.688 | ||
| List of potential successors was developed | SP 1 | 0.73 | |||
| Explicit succession criteria was developed | SP 2 | 0.72 | |||
| Efforts to train potential successors | SP 3 | 0.90 | |||
| Familiarize the potential successors with the business | SP 4 | 0.85 | |||
| Familiarize the potential successors with the employees | SP 5 | 0.71 | |||
| Decision was clearly communicated to family members | SP 6 | 0.94 | |||
| Decision was clearly communicated to key employees | SP 7 | 0.84 | |||
| Understanding of what the business strategy would be | SP 8 | 0.92 | |||
| Plan for the business after the transfer of leadership | SP 9 | 0.91 | |||
| Plan for the roles of the outgoing incumbent | SP 10 | 0.86 | |||
| Understanding roles of the outgoing incumbent | SP 11 | 0.68 | |||
| Financial package for the outgoing incumbent’s retirement | SP 12 | 0.84 | |||
| Incumbent willingness to step aside (IW) | 0.889 | 0.890 | 0.669 | ||
| Willingly let go of the leadership | IW 1 | 0.78 | |||
| Believes stepping aside would benefit the firm | IW 2 | 0.84 | |||
| Prepared to relinquish leadership role | IW 3 | 0.82 | |||
| Willingly to step back for new ideas | IW 4 | 0.83 | |||
| Sustainability (SUS) | 0.911 | 0.906 | 0.661 | ||
| Contributes to community improvement beyond business | SUS 1 | 0.88 | |||
| Sustainability is important to my firm | SUS 2 | 0.86 | |||
| My firm has a sustainability plan | SUS 3 | 0.88 | |||
| Having sustainable manager/successor is important | SUS 4 | 0.77 | |||
| My firm treats employees fairly | SUS 5 | 0.64 |
| Variable and items | Code | Loadings | α | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.962 | 0.963 | 0.688 | |||
| List of potential successors was developed | SP 1 | 0.73 | |||
| Explicit succession criteria was developed | SP 2 | 0.72 | |||
| Efforts to train potential successors | SP 3 | 0.90 | |||
| Familiarize the potential successors with the business | SP 4 | 0.85 | |||
| Familiarize the potential successors with the employees | SP 5 | 0.71 | |||
| Decision was clearly communicated to family members | SP 6 | 0.94 | |||
| Decision was clearly communicated to key employees | SP 7 | 0.84 | |||
| Understanding of what the business strategy would be | SP 8 | 0.92 | |||
| Plan for the business after the transfer of leadership | SP 9 | 0.91 | |||
| Plan for the roles of the outgoing incumbent | SP 10 | 0.86 | |||
| Understanding roles of the outgoing incumbent | SP 11 | 0.68 | |||
| Financial package for the outgoing incumbent’s retirement | SP 12 | 0.84 | |||
| 0.889 | 0.890 | 0.669 | |||
| Willingly let go of the leadership | IW 1 | 0.78 | |||
| Believes stepping aside would benefit the firm | IW 2 | 0.84 | |||
| Prepared to relinquish leadership role | IW 3 | 0.82 | |||
| Willingly to step back for new ideas | IW 4 | 0.83 | |||
| 0.911 | 0.906 | 0.661 | |||
| Contributes to community improvement beyond business | SUS 1 | 0.88 | |||
| Sustainability is important to my firm | SUS 2 | 0.86 | |||
| My firm has a sustainability plan | SUS 3 | 0.88 | |||
| Having sustainable manager/successor is important | SUS 4 | 0.77 | |||
| My firm treats employees fairly | SUS 5 | 0.64 |
Note(s): α- Cronbach’s alpha; CR- Composite Reliability; AVE- Average Variance Extracted
Model fit indices: χ2/df = 1.854; GFI = 0.934; NFI = 0.921; TLI = 0.953; IFI = 0.960; CFI = 0.960; RMSEA = 0.057; SRMR = 0.049
Source(s): Survey data (2023)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.