Figures
Fig. 2.1.New COVID-19 Cases Per Million Residents.19
Fig. 2.2.New COVID-19 Deaths Per Million Residents.20
Fig. 2.3.Percent Residents Expressing Varying Levels of Concern About the Pandemic.20
Fig. 2.4.Percent Residents Expressing Likelihood of Engaging in Various Behaviors.21
Fig. 2.5.Percent Residents Reporting Plans to Change None of the Listed Behaviors and Percent Planning to Change All 11 Listed Behaviors by Country.26
Fig. 3.1.Citizen Perceptions of the Causes of Pandemic in Spring and Autumn 2020, Shares of Agreement (%) and Margins of Error (95% Confidence Level).37
Fig. 3.2.Predicted Perceptions of the Causes of Pandemic in Spring (Round 1) and Autumn (Round 2) by Political Preference. Probabilities of Agreement with Margins of Errors.41
Fig. 4.1.Percent of Respondents Willing to Increase National Debt to Address COVID-19.51
Fig. 4.2.Percent of Respondents Wanting to Reduce, Maintain, or Increase Each Spending Category by Country.52
Fig. 5.1.Trust in Experts’ Capability to Solve COVID-19 Crisis, Satisfaction with Government Response to COVID-19 Crisis, and Daily Media Consumption Patterns in Finland and the United States in the T1 and T2 (Percentages).75
Fig. 5.2.Trust in Experts in Finland and the United States According to Satisfaction with Government Response to COVID-19 Crisis.77
Fig. 5.3.The Effect of Daily Media Consumption Patterns on Trust in Experts.78
Fig. 6.1.Exposure to Online Hate in Finland and the United States: 2020.92
Fig. 6.2.Exposure to Online Hate in Finland and the United States Among Young: 2013 and 2020.93
Fig. 6.3.Changes in Exposure to Online Hate Between April and November 2020.94
Fig. 7.1.Factors That Affect Maladaptive Coping: The United States and Finland.111
Fig. 7.2.Factors That Affect Active/Expressive and Planning Coping: The United States and Finland.113
Fig. 7.3.Factors That Affect Positive Reframing Coping: The United States and Finland.114
Fig. 7.4.Factors That Affect Religious Coping: The United States and Finland.115
Fig. 7.5.Predictors of Change in Life Satisfaction in November 2020: The United States and Finland.119
Fig. 9.1.Percent of Respondents Who Wore a Mask in Public During COVID-19.150
Tables
Table 3.1.Predicted Perceptions of the Causes of Pandemic in the United States.39
Table 3.2.Predicted Perceptions of the Causes of Pandemic in Finland.40
Table AI.Predicted Perceptions of the Causes of Pandemic in the United States and Finland.47
Table 4.1.Factors Predicting Public Spending Priorities in Finland and the United States: Welfare Spending, Development Spending, and Security Spending.54
Table 5.1.Descriptive Statistics.73
Table 5.2.Trust in Experts According to Satisfaction with Government, Media Consumption Patterns, and Control Variables.76
Table 6.1.Logistic Regression of Exposure to Online Hate in Finland and the United States.95
Table 7.1.Summary of the Significant Predictors with Their Direction for Coping Strategies: Finland and the United States.116
Table 8.1.Mean Compliance and Difference with Mask Wearing in Finland and the United States, April 2020 and November 2020.127
Table 8.2.Factors That Affect Compliance with Mask Wearing April 2020 and November 2020.131
Table 8.3.Factors That Affect Vaccine Intention, November 2020.136
Table 9.1.Logistic Regression of Vaccination Status in the United States and Finland.155
Table 9.2.Regression of Collaborative Relationship with the State in the United States and Finland.158
[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal