Table 3

Summary results of hypotheses testing

HypothesesType of effectStd. BetaBias-corrected confidence intervalsSupport
H1aEI_HOC - > SVDirect effect0.271***[0.175, 0.356]Yes
H1bEI_HOC - > GVDirect effect0.282***[0.175, 0.375]Yes
H2aEI_HOC - > EMVDirect effect0.280***[0.184, 0.369]Yes
H2bEI_HOC - > EVDirect effect0.310***[0.204, 0.401]Yes
H3aEI_HOC - > FVDirect effect0.247***[0.146, 0.339]Yes
H3bSV - > BInt_HOCDirect effect0.020[-0.062, 0.106]No
H4aGV - > BInt_HOCDirect effect0.228***[0.152, 0.310]Yes
H4bEMV - > BInt_HOCDirect effect0.425***[0.315, 0.527]Yes
H5aEV - > BInt_HOCDirect effect0.186***[0.094, 0.275]Yes
H5bFV - > BInt_HOCDirect effect0.101[-0.009, 0.206]No
H6EI_HOC - > SV - > BInt_HOCSpecific indirect effect0.005[-0.017, 0.030]No
H7EI_HOC - > GV - > BInt_HOCSpecific indirect effect0.064***[0.035, 0.102]Yes
H8EI_HOC - > EMV - > BInt_HOCSpecific indirect effect0.119***[0.072, 0.175]Yes
H9EI_HOC - > EV - > BInt_HOCSpecific indirect effect0.058**[0.029, 0.094]Yes
H10EI_HOC - > FV - > BInt_HOCSpecific indirect effect0.025[-0.001, 0.058]No
 EI_HOC - > BInt_HOCTotal indirect effect0.271***[0.191, 0.344] 

Note(s): 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals based on percentile bootstrapping (10,000); ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options