Comparing the new proposed solution with standard CD and HD
| Specification | HD | Classical CD | Proposed CD |
|---|---|---|---|
| High reduction ratio vs Size | ++ | + | ++ |
| High Overload Capability (min 200% better 500%) | − | ++ | ++ |
| Simple and cheap manufacturing | −− | − | = |
| Efficiency | − | = | = |
| Vibration and Acoustic Noise Reduction | = | = | + |
| Note: (the reference datum is the current gearbox adopted by the firm) |
| Specification | HD | Classical CD | Proposed CD |
|---|---|---|---|
| ++ | + | ++ | |
| − | ++ | ++ | |
| −− | − | = | |
| − | = | = | |
| = | = | + | |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.