Table 1.

Bivariate correlations of workplace characteristics and individual and situational variables with BEC dimensions

VariablesIndividual strainInterpersonal strainSelf-evaluation strain
Workplace characteristics   
Office layout0.1000.0360.060
Proximity−0.077−0.030−0.176*
Office comfort0.0230.1350.144*
Office use   
- Interaction0.0780.0850.168*
- Distraction−0.282**−0.176*−0.110
- Desk-switching0.0080.0740.210**
- Claiming−0.086−0.103−0.0.37
Possibility to telework−0.0150.020−0.006
ICT access0.0910.0760.155*
Individual control variables   
Demographics   
- Age0.1060.1090.277**
- GenderZ = −0.354**Z = −0.131Z = −0.767
- Education level0.046−0.066−0.064
- Household composition0.050−0.0240.061
Personality   
- Extraversion0.1210.221**0.263**
- Agreeableness0.0870.212**0.198**
- Conscientiousness0.0610.188*0.225**
- Neuroticism−0.202**−0.150*−0.314**
- Openness0.0150.231**0.158*
Work-related variables   
- Job RankZ = −0.218Z = −0.036Z = −0.133
- Work experience0.0380.0520.339**
- Activities_concentration−0.0390.1120.083
- Activities_informal interaction0.0970.191**0.080
- Activities_formal interaction0.0280.307**0.010
Situational variables   
Recognition0.228**0.297**0.146*
Overload0.365**0.106−0.037
Control0.1300.196**0.370**
Appreciation0.0540.367**0.290**

Notes:

** = significant at 0.01 level; * = significant at 0.05 level.

A test on interrelationships between the three BEC dimensions showed two correlations to be significant: between the individual and interpersonal strain (0.419**) and between the self-evaluation and interpersonal strain (0.289**). The correlation between individual strain and self-evaluation strain was not significant. As Maslach and Leiter (1997) did assume relations between all three strains, we stick to including all three relations in the path model, with arrows in both directions

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options