Coding book/dictionary
| Code | Sub-codes | Frequency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Digital marketing tools | ||||||
| 1.1. Digital marketing tools used to actively search for a job | ||||||
| 22 | ||||||
| Job boards | 16 | |||||
| Company’s website | 15 | |||||
| University’s platform | 13 | |||||
| Recruitment agencies | 6 | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 1.2. Digital marketing tools used to passively search for a job | ||||||
| Notifications via email | 29 | |||||
| Direct offers – via email or a LinkedIn message | 11 | |||||
| Facebook groups | 11 | |||||
| Display an advertisement | 8 | |||||
| 1.3. Digital marketing tools which are more relevant for the decision to apply for a job | ||||||
| Digital marketing tools owned by the company | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| Company’s website | 10 | |||||
| Reasons why they are the most relevant | ||||||
| i) More information | 15 | |||||
| ii) More trustworthy and professional | 11 | |||||
| iii) More personalised and interactive | 5 | |||||
| iv) Direct contact with the recruiter | 2 | |||||
| v) Other tools redirect to them | 2 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools earned by the company | ||||||
| University’s platform | 7 | |||||
| Job boards | 5 | |||||
| Reasons why they are the most relevant | ||||||
| i) Quantity of job offers | 6 | |||||
| ii) Discover new companies and job functions | 4 | |||||
| iii) Unaware of other platforms | 1 | |||||
| 1.4. Digital marketing tools used to apply for a job | ||||||
| Indifferent | 10 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools owned by the company | ||||||
| Company’s website | 13 | |||||
| 8 | ||||||
| i) An easy-to-apply tool | 2 | |||||
| ii) Redirects to the company website or email address | 2 | |||||
| Reasons why they are the most relevant | ||||||
| i) More trustworthy and professional | 16 | |||||
| ii) Security | 1 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools earned by the company | ||||||
| University’s platform | 2 | |||||
| 1.5. Social networking sites (SNS) | ||||||
| Seen as not being credible when/because | ||||||
| i) More personal, less professional | 34 | |||||
| ii) Doubt the trustworthiness and credibility of offers | 11 | |||||
| iii) Lacks structure and was not built for this purpose | 5 | |||||
| iv) Has less information | 4 | |||||
| v) Groups with less specific audience | ||||||
| vi) Seen as a “last call”, urgent action | 3 | |||||
| Seen as credible when | ||||||
| i) Groups with alumni or specific audience | 12 | |||||
| ii) Redirects to other tool/platform or email address | 4 | |||||
| iii) Individuals know the people who advertise the job offer better | 3 | |||||
| iv) Publication on the company’s profile | 1 | |||||
| Seen as more credible | 28 | |||||
| i) More professional, serious and trustworthy | 35 | |||||
| ii) More structured and has more information | 27 | |||||
| 2. Information that influences the decision to apply for a job | ||||||
| 2.1. Job offer – function, requisites and type of contract | 34 | |||||
| 2.2. Company – industry, culture, vision, products and services | 27 | |||||
| 2.3. Salary | 10 | |||||
| 2.4. HR factors – training and turnover rates | 8 | |||||
| 2.5. Team members and qualifications | 5 | |||||
| 2.6. Information sources | ||||||
| Search engine | 6 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools owned by the company | ||||||
| Company’s website | 18 | |||||
| 12 | ||||||
| Seen as more credible | 45 | |||||
| Seen as less credible | 11 | |||||
| Doubts regarding trustworthiness of the information provided | 13 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools earned by the company | ||||||
| Word-of-mouth | 12 | |||||
| Someone with a current or former link to the company | 20 | |||||
| Someone with no current or former link to the company | 4 | |||||
| University’s platform | 3 | |||||
| Job boards | 2 | |||||
| Seen as more credible | 15 | |||||
| 3. Content marketing | ||||||
| 3.1. Positive influence on the decision to apply for a job | 21 | |||||
| Differentiation of the company | 20 | |||||
| More information about the company, culture and team | 12 | |||||
| Has a role in the decision, but it is not an eliminatory factor | 6 | |||||
| More willingness to apply for a job in the industry, but not necessarily for the company | 1 | |||||
| 3.2. No influence on the decision to apply for a job | 7 | |||||
| 3.3. Positive impact on company’s attractiveness | 24 | |||||
| Shows the company’s points of view and the willingness to start a conversation | 10 | |||||
| 3.4. No impact on the company’s attractiveness | 3 | |||||
| 3.5. Company’s industry influence on candidates’ perception | 3 | |||||
| 3.6 Videos | 4 | |||||
| 4. Reputation | ||||||
| 4.1. Sources of reputation | ||||||
| Current or former employees | 14 | |||||
| Glassdoor and similar websites | 6 | |||||
| Media | 5 | |||||
| Clients | 1 | |||||
| 4.2. Has an influence on decision to apply for a job | 25 | |||||
| Negative reputation | 11 | |||||
| 4.3. Does not have an influence on the decision to apply for a job | 9 | |||||
| The case of small companies and startups | 7 | |||||
| 4.4. Reputation is more important than the information provided by the company | 32 | |||||
| 4.5 Reputation is less important than the information provided by the company | 15 | |||||
| 4.6. Reputation and information provided by the company are seen as being complementary | 9 | |||||
| Code | Sub-codes | Frequency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Digital marketing tools | ||||||
| 1.1. Digital marketing tools used to actively search for a job | ||||||
| 22 | ||||||
| Job boards | 16 | |||||
| Company’s website | 15 | |||||
| University’s platform | 13 | |||||
| Recruitment agencies | 6 | |||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 1.2. Digital marketing tools used to passively search for a job | ||||||
| Notifications via email | 29 | |||||
| Direct offers – via email or a LinkedIn message | 11 | |||||
| Facebook groups | 11 | |||||
| Display an advertisement | 8 | |||||
| 1.3. Digital marketing tools which are more relevant for the decision to apply for a job | ||||||
| Digital marketing tools owned by the company | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| Company’s website | 10 | |||||
| Reasons why they are the most relevant | ||||||
| i) More information | 15 | |||||
| ii) More trustworthy and professional | 11 | |||||
| iii) More personalised and interactive | 5 | |||||
| iv) Direct contact with the recruiter | 2 | |||||
| v) Other tools redirect to them | 2 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools earned by the company | ||||||
| University’s platform | 7 | |||||
| Job boards | 5 | |||||
| Reasons why they are the most relevant | ||||||
| i) Quantity of job offers | 6 | |||||
| ii) Discover new companies and job functions | 4 | |||||
| iii) Unaware of other platforms | 1 | |||||
| 1.4. Digital marketing tools used to apply for a job | ||||||
| Indifferent | 10 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools owned by the company | ||||||
| Company’s website | 13 | |||||
| 8 | ||||||
| i) An easy-to-apply tool | 2 | |||||
| ii) Redirects to the company website or email address | 2 | |||||
| Reasons why they are the most relevant | ||||||
| i) More trustworthy and professional | 16 | |||||
| ii) Security | 1 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools earned by the company | ||||||
| University’s platform | 2 | |||||
| 1.5. Social networking sites (SNS) | ||||||
| Seen as not being credible when/because | ||||||
| i) More personal, less professional | 34 | |||||
| ii) Doubt the trustworthiness and credibility of offers | 11 | |||||
| iii) Lacks structure and was not built for this purpose | 5 | |||||
| iv) Has less information | 4 | |||||
| v) Groups with less specific audience | ||||||
| vi) Seen as a “last call”, urgent action | 3 | |||||
| Seen as credible when | ||||||
| i) Groups with alumni or specific audience | 12 | |||||
| ii) Redirects to other tool/platform or email address | 4 | |||||
| iii) Individuals know the people who advertise the job offer better | 3 | |||||
| iv) Publication on the company’s profile | 1 | |||||
| Seen as more credible | 28 | |||||
| i) More professional, serious and trustworthy | 35 | |||||
| ii) More structured and has more information | 27 | |||||
| 2. Information that influences the decision to apply for a job | ||||||
| 2.1. Job offer – function, requisites and type of contract | 34 | |||||
| 2.2. Company – industry, culture, vision, products and services | 27 | |||||
| 2.3. Salary | 10 | |||||
| 2.4. HR factors – training and turnover rates | 8 | |||||
| 2.5. Team members and qualifications | 5 | |||||
| 2.6. Information sources | ||||||
| Search engine | 6 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools owned by the company | ||||||
| Company’s website | 18 | |||||
| 12 | ||||||
| Seen as more credible | 45 | |||||
| Seen as less credible | 11 | |||||
| Doubts regarding trustworthiness of the information provided | 13 | |||||
| Digital marketing tools earned by the company | ||||||
| Word-of-mouth | 12 | |||||
| Someone with a current or former link to the company | 20 | |||||
| Someone with no current or former link to the company | 4 | |||||
| University’s platform | 3 | |||||
| Job boards | 2 | |||||
| Seen as more credible | 15 | |||||
| 3. Content marketing | ||||||
| 3.1. Positive influence on the decision to apply for a job | 21 | |||||
| Differentiation of the company | 20 | |||||
| More information about the company, culture and team | 12 | |||||
| Has a role in the decision, but it is not an eliminatory factor | 6 | |||||
| More willingness to apply for a job in the industry, but not necessarily for the company | 1 | |||||
| 3.2. No influence on the decision to apply for a job | 7 | |||||
| 3.3. Positive impact on company’s attractiveness | 24 | |||||
| Shows the company’s points of view and the willingness to start a conversation | 10 | |||||
| 3.4. No impact on the company’s attractiveness | 3 | |||||
| 3.5. Company’s industry influence on candidates’ perception | 3 | |||||
| 3.6 Videos | 4 | |||||
| 4. Reputation | ||||||
| 4.1. Sources of reputation | ||||||
| Current or former employees | 14 | |||||
| Glassdoor and similar websites | 6 | |||||
| Media | 5 | |||||
| Clients | 1 | |||||
| 4.2. Has an influence on decision to apply for a job | 25 | |||||
| Negative reputation | 11 | |||||
| 4.3. Does not have an influence on the decision to apply for a job | 9 | |||||
| The case of small companies and startups | 7 | |||||
| 4.4. Reputation is more important than the information provided by the company | 32 | |||||
| 4.5 Reputation is less important than the information provided by the company | 15 | |||||
| 4.6. Reputation and information provided by the company are seen as being complementary | 9 | |||||
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.