Regression results of the first stage of the MESR model
| Variables | PCT1SMT0 | PCT0SMT1 | PCT1SMT1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.074 (0.074) | −0.132* (0.068) | −0.001 (0.064) |
| Age | 0.023 (0.100) | −0.177* (0.085) | −0.055 (0.071) |
| Education | 0.019 (0.070) | 0.125* (0.072) | −0.029 (0.064) |
| Asset value | −0.027 (0.023) | −0.015 (0.022) | 0.042** (0.019) |
| Household size | −0.086 (0.054) | 0.042 (0.048) | 0.022 (0.040) |
| Migrant work | 0.031*** (0.009) | −0.012 (0.008) | 0.006 (0.007) |
| Cooperative | 0.261*** (0.072) | −0.003 (0.051) | 0.053 (0.035) |
| Kiwi scale | −0.039 (0.039) | −0.049 (0.032) | 0.035 (0.025) |
| Land fragmentation | 0.010* (0.006) | −0.007 (0.006) | 0.005 (0.004) |
| Land quality | −0.005 (0.016) | 0.038** (0.016) | 0.090*** (0.015) |
| Annual watering | −0.064*** (0.021) | 0.090*** (0.023) | −0.011 (0.018) |
| Credit constraints | 0.028* (0.015) | 0.002 (0.013) | −0.027** (0.012) |
| Information accessibility | −0.009 (0.014) | 0.031** (0.013) | 0.011 (0.011) |
| Township distance | −0.012 (0.028) | −0.053** (0.027) | 0.038 (0.025) |
| Technical training | −0.071*** (0.026) | −0.019 (0.021) | 0.099*** (0.018) |
| Technical guidance | −0.011 (0.036) | 0.214*** (0.026) | 0.022 (0.025) |
| Government promotion | −0.025* (0.014) | −0.012 (0.013) | 0.059*** (0.014) |
| The joint significance value of instrumental variables | 129.220*** | ||
| The joint significance value of control variables | 157.640*** | ||
| Wald value | 268.950*** | ||
| Number of samples | 650 | ||
| Variables | PCT1SMT0 | PCT0SMT1 | PCT1SMT1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.074 (0.074) | −0.132* (0.068) | −0.001 (0.064) |
| Age | 0.023 (0.100) | −0.177* (0.085) | −0.055 (0.071) |
| Education | 0.019 (0.070) | 0.125* (0.072) | −0.029 (0.064) |
| Asset value | −0.027 (0.023) | −0.015 (0.022) | 0.042** (0.019) |
| Household size | −0.086 (0.054) | 0.042 (0.048) | 0.022 (0.040) |
| Migrant work | 0.031*** (0.009) | −0.012 (0.008) | 0.006 (0.007) |
| Cooperative | 0.261*** (0.072) | −0.003 (0.051) | 0.053 (0.035) |
| Kiwi scale | −0.039 (0.039) | −0.049 (0.032) | 0.035 (0.025) |
| Land fragmentation | 0.010* (0.006) | −0.007 (0.006) | 0.005 (0.004) |
| Land quality | −0.005 (0.016) | 0.038** (0.016) | 0.090*** (0.015) |
| Annual watering | −0.064*** (0.021) | 0.090*** (0.023) | −0.011 (0.018) |
| Credit constraints | 0.028* (0.015) | 0.002 (0.013) | −0.027** (0.012) |
| Information accessibility | −0.009 (0.014) | 0.031** (0.013) | 0.011 (0.011) |
| Township distance | −0.012 (0.028) | −0.053** (0.027) | 0.038 (0.025) |
| Technical training | −0.071*** (0.026) | −0.019 (0.021) | 0.099*** (0.018) |
| Technical guidance | −0.011 (0.036) | 0.214*** (0.026) | 0.022 (0.025) |
| Government promotion | −0.025* (0.014) | −0.012 (0.013) | 0.059*** (0.014) |
| The joint significance value of instrumental variables | 129.220*** | ||
| The joint significance value of control variables | 157.640*** | ||
| Wald value | 268.950*** | ||
| Number of samples | 650 | ||
Notes:
*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01. Robust standard errors are in parentheses
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.