Adaptation and resilience to climate change, expressed as: number of respondents (percentage of respondents)
| Axes | All Yangambi landscape | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Practice reported Practice based on impacts | Kisangani–Yangambi axis (n = 65) | Yangambi–Ngazi axis (n = 45) | Yangambi center (n = 140) | All Yangambi landscape (n = 250) | p-value | CSA practice |
| Agricultural yields reduction | 0.027 | |||||
| No adaptation tracks | 65 (100.0) | 40 (88.9) | 114 (81.4) | 219 (87.6) | ||
| Directly resume seeding | 5 (11.1) | 9 (6.4) | 14 (5.6) | – | ||
| Clearing a new field in forest | 5 (3.6) | 5 (2.0) | – | |||
| Fertilizers | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.4) | + | |||
| Back to fallow | 2 (1.4) | 2 (0.8) | + | |||
| Crops rotation | 7 (5.0) | 7 (2.8) | + | |||
| Other | 2 (1.4) | 2 (0.8) | ||||
| Crops pests | 0.006 | |||||
| No adaptation tracks | 49 (75.4) | 40 (88.9) | 118 (84.3) | 207 (82.8) | ||
| Bio-pesticides | 9 (6.4) | 9 (6.4) | + | |||
| Mechanical control | 15 (23.1) | 5 (11.1) | 13 (9.3) | 33 (13.2) | – | |
| Axes | All Yangambi landscape | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Practice reported | Kisangani–Yangambi axis | Yangambi–Ngazi axis | Yangambi center | All Yangambi landscape | CSA practice | |
| 0.027 | ||||||
| No adaptation tracks | 65 (100.0) | 40 (88.9) | 114 (81.4) | 219 (87.6) | ||
| Directly resume seeding | 5 (11.1) | 9 (6.4) | 14 (5.6) | – | ||
| Clearing a new field in forest | 5 (3.6) | 5 (2.0) | – | |||
| Fertilizers | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.4) | + | |||
| Back to fallow | 2 (1.4) | 2 (0.8) | + | |||
| Crops rotation | 7 (5.0) | 7 (2.8) | + | |||
| Other | 2 (1.4) | 2 (0.8) | ||||
| 0.006 | ||||||
| No adaptation tracks | 49 (75.4) | 40 (88.9) | 118 (84.3) | 207 (82.8) | ||
| Bio-pesticides | 9 (6.4) | 9 (6.4) | + | |||
| Mechanical control | 15 (23.1) | 5 (11.1) | 13 (9.3) | 33 (13.2) | – | |
Notes:
Legend: + = CSA practice, – = non-CSA practice, X(Y): X = frequency and Y = percentage