Summary of the objectives and approaches of higher education institutions in the use of learning analytics
| Institution | Approaches | Objectives | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Albany Technical College | Monitoring, intervention | Identify at-risk students and provide them with counselling | Karkhanis and Dumbre (2015) |
| 2. Ball State University | Monitoring, intervention | Identify at-risk students and provide them with counselling Increase effectiveness by reducing the time required to diagnose problems and targeting specific issues Help the institution to make informed decisions about student success programmes and retention services Allow students to become aware of the gaps between their behaviours and expected outcomes, to understand elements of their academic success, and to utilize on-campus resources to solve their problems | Jones and Woosley (2011) |
| 3. Bowie State University | Monitoring, intervention | Support student retention Track students’ progress towards graduation to facilitate decision making Provide early alerts for staff to intervene to prevent dropout | Chacon et al. (2012) |
| 4. Bridgewater College | Monitoring, intervention | Track students’ attainment level Support students to do better than the national average | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 5. California State University | Monitoring | Analyse how students use the learning management system | Allen et al. (2012) |
| 6. Drexel University | Updating data and curriculum | Measure the effectiveness of specific course components through maintaining data records aligned with the curriculum, courses and syllabi, course learning objectives and assessment strategies Manage student learning outcomes and performance criteria | Harvey (2013) |
| 7. Edith Cowan University | Monitoring, intervention | Identify students who need support Establish a system to contact a large number of students and manage interventions Improve student retention Improve graduation rates | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 8. Georgia Institute of Technology and Carnegie Mellon University | Monitoring, analysis | Better scaffolded online discussion to improve learning in a MOOC context Explore effects of higher-order thinking behaviours in learning Identify kinds of discussion behaviours associated with learning Investigate types of learning materials which trigger richer discussion | Wang et al. (2016) |
| 9. Harvard University | Monitoring, prediction | Analyse the extent to which students’ responses about motivation and utility value can predict persistence and completion of study | Robinson et al. (2016) |
| 10. Lancaster University | Monitoring, intervention, feedback | Allow tutors to access the transcripts of their students Allow early intervention Ensure student work is graded and feedback given to students in a timely manner | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 11. Loughborough University | Feedback | Provide academics with a better and more holistic picture of student engagement Provide staff with actionable insights into student learning experience Provide students with their own educational data in a meaningful way | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 12. Manchester Metropolitan University | Monitoring, curriculum design | Improve student experience as reflected in the National Student Survey Provide data for improving the undergraduate curriculum | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 13. Marist College | Prediction, intervention | Predict academic success Provide interventions | Jayaprakash et al. (2014) |
| 14. McGill University | Monitoring, analysis | Identify misconceptions of medical students as reflected in their interactions in the online learning environment | Poitras et al. (2016) |
| 15. New York Institute of Technology | Prediction, intervention | Create an at-risk model to identify students in need of support Improve student retention in their first year of study Provide information that could support counsellor in their work | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 16. Northern Arizona University | Feedback | Facilitate online interaction between students and instructors Allow students to receive direct feedback on issues such as academic concerns and grades | Star and Collette (2010) |
| 17. Nottingham Trent University | Intervention | Enhance retention and improve attainment Increase students’ sense of belonging within the course community, particularly with tutors | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 18. Open Universities Australia | Intervention | Identify at-risk students Suggest alternative modules to students which are more appropriate for their needs | Atif et al. (2013) |
| 19. Open University of Catalonia | Information collection and management | Identify automatically pieces of knowledge taught in each subject Gather students’ information Keep information updated | Guitart et al. (2015) |
| 20. Oxford Brookes University | Monitoring | Improve student experience Support progress evaluation of modules and programmes, and the identification of priorities at an institutional level | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 21. Paul Smith’s College | Monitoring, intervention | Identify at-risk students and prioritize outreach for them Provide more efficient and effective interventions for student success | McAleese and Taylor (2012) |
| 22. Portland State University | Information management | Make information more accessible and easier to use | Blanton (2012) |
| 23. Purdue University | Monitoring, intervention | Give students early and frequent performance notifications Help faculty members to steer students towards additional campus resources as needed | Arnold and Pistilli (2012) |
| 24. Rio Salado College | Prediction | Identify factors having a significant statistical correlations with final course outcomes | Grush (2011) |
| 25. San Diego State University | Intervention | Identify methods and interventions that would alleviate students’ failure Discover approaches that could be applied with minimal support and are scalable to a large number of courses | Dodge et al. (2015) |
| 26. The Hong Kong Institute of Education | Monitoring, feedback | Provide insights into predicting students’ performance Develop measures to assess students’ online learning Boost teachers’ and students’ interaction Allow students to realize their knowledge discovery Facilitate teachers to assess students’ performance | Wong and Li (2016) |
| 27. The Open University (UK) | Monitoring, intervention, personalization | Identify learners at risk and needing support Improve learning design Deliver personalized intervention for students Achieve cost-effectiveness | Rienties et al. (2016) |
| Identifying patterns | Identify common patterns in course design Find out pedagogical implications for various patterns and learning designs | Toetenel and Rienties (2016) | |
| 28. The Technical University of Madrid | Monitoring, evaluation | Support teachers’ monitoring and evaluation of individual students’ progress within a team | Fidalgo-Blanco et al. (2015) |
| 29. The University of Adelaide | Monitoring, feedback | Analyse students’ online discussion data, such as team mood, role distribution and emotional climate Develop students’ soft skills necessary for collaborative work | Tarmazdi et al. (2015) |
| 30. The University of East London | Monitoring, feedback | Monitor student attendance and learning activities Collect student data, such as demographic information, library activities, coursework, and download of free books Send automated e-mails to students showing their attendance, and warnings to students without satisfactory attendance | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 31. The University of Melbourne | Monitoring, analysis | Investigate how motivation and participation influence students’ performance in a MOOC | Barba et al. (2016) |
| Analyse how MOOC participants use online forums to support learning | Milligan (2015) | ||
| Investigate how students interpret feedback delivered via learning analytics dashboard and the relevant influence on their learning strategies and motivation | Corrin and Barba (2015) | ||
| 32. Universidad a Distancia de Madrid | Monitoring, analysis | Find predictors of teamwork and commitment as cross-curricular competences | Iglesias-Pradas et al. (2015) |
| 33. University of Edinburgh | Analysis, prediction | Examine MOOC data about students who enroled in the same course at least twice Identify changes in their behaviours between the two enrolments to the same course | Kovanović et al. (2016) |
| 34. University of Maryland, Baltimore County | Monitoring, feedback, reflection | Reduce student barriers Create a community of learners Improve students’ self-awareness by providing feedback Provide early alerts to students if their GPA falls below a level | Mattingly et al. (2012) |
| 35. University of Michigan | Monitoring, personalization, reflection | Identify at-risk students Provide personalized feedback to students | Mattingly et al. (2012) |
| 36. University of New England | Monitoring, intervention | Foster a sense of community among students studying part-time, at a distance as well as on-campus Identify students who are struggling in order to provide timely support Develop a dynamic, systematic and automated process to capture the learning well-being status of students Encourage peer-to-peer student networking Disseminate information and connect support staff with the students | Sclater et al. (2016) |
| 37. University of North Bengal | Prediction | Examine the predictive relationship between learners’ pre-entry demographic information and their dropout behaviours | Yasmine (2013) |
| 38. University of Rijeka | Data mining, analysis | Find out factors leading to student success in study Identify problems timely and increase the course pass rate | Sisovic et al. (2015) |
| 39. University of Salamanca | Information extraction, analysis | Extract information useful for teaching/administrative staff, such as interaction of students with peers, teachers, the system, and course contents Provide teachers with tools to facilitate managerial tasks | Conde et al. (2015) |
| Support practical learning in a 3D virtual environment, analyse the problems that arisen, and report relevant data to students and teachers | Cruz-Benito et al. (2014) | ||
| 40. University of Santiago de Compostela | Analysis, evaluation | Generate automatically reports of learners’ activities that take place in a virtual learning environment Improve the efficiency of the evaluation process | Gewerc et al. (2014) |
| 41. University of Sydney | Analysis, observation | Identify the relationship among student performance, choices of programming languages for study, and times at which a student starts and stops working on an assignment | Gramoli et al. (2016) |
| 42. University of the South Pacific | Monitoring | Track individual learners’ online and offline interactions with open learning resources | Prasad et al. (2016) |
| 43. University of Wollongong | Analysis, intervention, reflection | Visualize patterns of student interactions on discussion forums Allow instructors to identify at-risk students and potentially high and low performing students for planning interventions, and the extent to which a learner community is developing in a class | Mat et al. (2013) |
| Institution | Approaches | Objectives | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Albany Technical College | Monitoring, intervention | Identify at-risk students and provide them with counselling | |
| 2. Ball State University | Monitoring, intervention | Identify at-risk students and provide them with counselling | |
| 3. Bowie State University | Monitoring, intervention | Support student retention | |
| 4. Bridgewater College | Monitoring, intervention | Track students’ attainment level | |
| 5. California State University | Monitoring | Analyse how students use the learning management system | |
| 6. Drexel University | Updating data and curriculum | Measure the effectiveness of specific course components through maintaining data records aligned with the curriculum, courses and syllabi, course learning objectives and assessment strategies | |
| 7. Edith Cowan University | Monitoring, intervention | Identify students who need support | |
| 8. Georgia Institute of Technology and Carnegie Mellon University | Monitoring, analysis | Better scaffolded online discussion to improve learning in a MOOC context | |
| 9. Harvard University | Monitoring, prediction | Analyse the extent to which students’ responses about motivation and utility value can predict persistence and completion of study | |
| 10. Lancaster University | Monitoring, intervention, feedback | Allow tutors to access the transcripts of their students | |
| 11. Loughborough University | Feedback | Provide academics with a better and more holistic picture of student engagement | |
| 12. Manchester Metropolitan University | Monitoring, curriculum design | Improve student experience as reflected in the National Student Survey | |
| 13. Marist College | Prediction, intervention | Predict academic success | |
| 14. McGill University | Monitoring, analysis | Identify misconceptions of medical students as reflected in their interactions in the online learning environment | |
| 15. New York Institute of Technology | Prediction, intervention | Create an at-risk model to identify students in need of support | |
| 16. Northern Arizona University | Feedback | Facilitate online interaction between students and instructors | |
| 17. Nottingham Trent University | Intervention | Enhance retention and improve attainment | |
| 18. Open Universities Australia | Intervention | Identify at-risk students | |
| 19. Open University of Catalonia | Information collection and management | Identify automatically pieces of knowledge taught in each subject | |
| 20. Oxford Brookes University | Monitoring | Improve student experience | |
| 21. Paul Smith’s College | Monitoring, intervention | Identify at-risk students and prioritize outreach for them | |
| 22. Portland State University | Information management | Make information more accessible and easier to use | |
| 23. Purdue University | Monitoring, intervention | Give students early and frequent performance notifications | |
| 24. Rio Salado College | Prediction | Identify factors having a significant statistical correlations with final course outcomes | |
| 25. San Diego State University | Intervention | Identify methods and interventions that would alleviate students’ failure | |
| 26. The Hong Kong Institute of Education | Monitoring, feedback | Provide insights into predicting students’ performance | |
| 27. The Open University (UK) | Monitoring, intervention, personalization | Identify learners at risk and needing support | |
| Identifying patterns | Identify common patterns in course design | ||
| 28. The Technical University of Madrid | Monitoring, evaluation | Support teachers’ monitoring and evaluation of individual students’ progress within a team | |
| 29. The University of Adelaide | Monitoring, feedback | Analyse students’ online discussion data, such as team mood, role distribution and emotional climate | |
| 30. The University of East London | Monitoring, feedback | Monitor student attendance and learning activities | |
| 31. The University of Melbourne | Monitoring, analysis | Investigate how motivation and participation influence students’ performance in a MOOC | Barba |
| Analyse how MOOC participants use online forums to support learning | |||
| Investigate how students interpret feedback delivered via learning analytics dashboard and the relevant influence on their learning strategies and motivation | |||
| 32. Universidad a Distancia de Madrid | Monitoring, analysis | Find predictors of teamwork and commitment as cross-curricular competences | |
| 33. University of Edinburgh | Analysis, prediction | Examine MOOC data about students who enroled in the same course at least twice | |
| 34. University of Maryland, Baltimore County | Monitoring, feedback, reflection | Reduce student barriers | |
| 35. University of Michigan | Monitoring, personalization, reflection | Identify at-risk students | |
| 36. University of New England | Monitoring, intervention | Foster a sense of community among students studying part-time, at a distance as well as on-campus | |
| 37. University of North Bengal | Prediction | Examine the predictive relationship between learners’ pre-entry demographic information and their dropout behaviours | |
| 38. University of Rijeka | Data mining, analysis | Find out factors leading to student success in study | |
| 39. University of Salamanca | Information extraction, analysis | Extract information useful for teaching/administrative staff, such as interaction of students with peers, teachers, the system, and course contents | |
| Support practical learning in a 3D virtual environment, analyse the problems that arisen, and report relevant data to students and teachers | |||
| 40. University of Santiago de Compostela | Analysis, evaluation | Generate automatically reports of learners’ activities that take place in a virtual learning environment | |
| 41. University of Sydney | Analysis, observation | Identify the relationship among student performance, choices of programming languages for study, and times at which a student starts and stops working on an assignment | |
| 42. University of the South Pacific | Monitoring | Track individual learners’ online and offline interactions with open learning resources | |
| 43. University of Wollongong | Analysis, intervention, reflection | Visualize patterns of student interactions on discussion forums |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.