An empirical comparison between the standard C4.5 classifier and proposed model on benchmark tests
| Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Standard C4.5 classifier | Proposed model | p-value |
| (a) Benchmark data with G1 | |||
| α | 0.6193±0.0184 | 0.6472±0.0170 | 9.69E−008 |
| β | 30.00±0.00 | 15.73±2.36 | <2.2E−16 |
| (b) Benchmark data with G2 | |||
| α | 0.5499±0.0189 | 0.5863±0.0153 | 3.01E−011 |
| β | 30.00±0.00 | 12.97±2.46 | <2.2E−16 |
| (c) Benchmark data with G3 | |||
| α | 0.6131±0.0259 | 0.6433±0.0108 | 2.12E−007 |
| β | 30.00±0.00 | 14.03±2.27 | <2.2E−16 |
| Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Standard C4.5 classifier | Proposed model | |
| 0.6193±0.0184 | 9.69E−008 | ||
| 30.00±0.00 | <2.2E−16 | ||
| 0.5499±0.0189 | 3.01E−011 | ||
| 30.00±0.00 | <2.2E−16 | ||
| 0.6131±0.0259 | 2.12E−007 | ||
| 30.00±0.00 | <2.2E−16 | ||
Notes: Mean±standard deviation for 30 runs experimental results and computed p-values. Mean values marked in italics indicate best statistical significance results at 95% confidence interval under the pairwise t-test comparisons