Table II

Summary of findings

PartyActivities related to additive manufacturingProactiveReactiveRegain balance/create imbalance
Manufacturers of 3D printersManufacture printersCreating silos of lock-in effects through requesting specific powder for each printer Trying to rule the market through specific powders (create imbalance)
Raw material producersComplement product portfolio with powderPowder to avoid future competitionPowder that can be used in various printersManufacturing of powder to meet competition (regain)
Powder not for specific printers to decrease such dependence between manufacturers of printers and sub-suppliers/manufacturers (regain)
Sub-suppliersManufacture components for manufacturing firms; creating around-the-clock productionUtilisation of printersAvoid risk of being outperformed by manufacturing firms’ home fabricationAvoid risk of manufacturing firms (customers) doing the production themselves (regain balance, partially)
Logistics firmsCreate fab labs for local printing Risk that less transportation is neededBalance decreased use of transport (regain)
Manufacturing firmsProduce prototypes, spare parts, etc.Home fabrication of spare parts. Changed design or products. Increased customisation Increase home fabrication (create imbalance towards sub-suppliers; regain from customers)
CustomersPotentially manufacture goods themselves. Demand of customisationDemand for customisationHome fabricationHome fabrication and customisation (create imbalance)
Societal supportSupport and test technologiesTrying to advance additive manufacturing use Sponsor sub-suppliers with printers (no attempt to create or regain power, but affects the balance in the supply chain)

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal