Table 5 Summary of mediating effect...

Table 5

Summary of mediating effect tests

Total effect on IB (model 1)					Direct effect on IB (model 2)					Indirect effect on IB (model 2)
			BCCI					BCCI					BCCI
	Path	t	Lower	Upper		Path	t	Lower	Upper		Point estimate	t	Lower	Upper	Sig	VAF
IL (c)	0.74***	20.36	0.67	0.79	H1: IL (c′)	0.67***	10.62	0.68	0.80	H2: ab₁ (via GL)	0.07*	1.72	0.01	0.14	Yes	9.37%
Control variables
Cc	0.02	0.25	−0.13	0.17		0.02	0.25	−0.08	0.17

Total effect on IB (model 1)					Direct effect on IB (model 2)					Indirect effect on IB (model 2)
			BCCI					BCCI					BCCI
	Path	t	Lower	Upper		Path	t	Lower	Upper		Point estimate	t	Lower	Upper	Sig	VAF
IL (c)	0.74***	20.36	0.67	0.79	H1: IL (c′)	0.67***	10.62	0.68	0.80	H2: ab₁ (via GL)	0.07*	1.72	0.01	0.14	Yes	9.37%
Control variables
Cc	0.02	0.25	−0.13	0.17		0.02	0.25	−0.08	0.17

Note(s): GL: Group learning, IL: Individual learning, IB: Innovative behaviour, JA: Job autonomy, Cc: Country culture. BCCI: Bias corrected confidence interval. VAF: Variance accounted for. Bootstrapping based on n = 5,000 subsamples. (based on t (4,999), one-tailed test) t (0.05; 4,999) = 1.645; t (0.01, 4,999) = 2.327; t (0.001, 4,999) = 3.092; (based on t (4,999), two-tailed test); t (0.05, 4,999) = 1.960, t (0.01, 4,999) = 2.577; t (0.001, 4,999) = 3.292. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Original table – created by authors of this article from data

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable