Table 2

Hypothesis testing results

Harmonious passionWork-home enrichment
β (SE)t95% CIβ (SE)t95% CI
Constant−0.03 (0.17)−0.19−0.37, 0.313.96 (0.35)11.44***3.28, 4.65
Gender−0.01 (0.05)−0.24−0.10, 0.080.15 (0.09)1.60−0.03, 0.33
Age0.05 (0.03)1.90−0.00, 0.11−0.03 (0.06)−0.45−0.13, 0.08
Work tenure−0.05 (0.03)−1.58−0.11, 0.010.19 (0.06)3.22**0.08, 0.31
Marital status−0.07 (0.05)−1.28−0.17, 0.040.05 (0.11)0.51−0.16, 0.27
Education0.08 (0.03)2.47*0.02, 0.150.14 (0.07)2.05*0.01, 0.27
Social support0.23 (0.02)9.39***0.18, 0.280.13 (0.06)2.39*0.02, 0.24
Harmonious passion0.88 (0.11)8.21***0.67, 1.09
Strengths use0.78 (0.04)19.93***0.70, 0.860.12 (0.12)1.04−0.11, 0.35
Social support*Strengths use−0.11 (0.04)−2.73**−0.18, −0.03
Harmonious passion*Strengths use0.38 (0.09)4.39***0.21, 0.55
R2 = 0.69, F(8,348) = 96.71***R2 = 0.48, F(9,347) = 35.54***
Effect (SE)tLLCIULCI
Conditional effects of social support at values of strengths use
−1SD0.30 (0.03)8.72***0.230.36
00.23 (0.02)9.39***0.180.28
+1SD0.16 (0.03)4.72***0.100.23
Conditional effects of harmonious passion at values of strengths use
−1SD0.64 (0.11)5.66***0.420.86
00.88 (0.11)8.21***0.671.09
+1SD1.12 (0.13)8.82***0.871.37

Note(s): *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Unstandardized coefficients are reported

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal