Table 6

Predictors of motivational and cognitive workaholism across profiles

Motivational workaholismCognitive workaholism
Step 1Step 2Step 3Step 1Step 2Step 3
Profile123123123123123123
Control variablesBBBBBB
 Gender−0.10−0.010.03−0.15−0.010.03−0.15−0.010.03−0.12−0.110.04−0.18−0.110.04−0.16−0.100.04
 Children−0.06−0.150.03−0.08−0.150.03−0.07−0.150.030.10−0.05−0.050.09−0.05−0.050.13−0.05−0.05
 RW   0.29**−0.020.010.160.14−0.01   0.29**0.07−0.07−0.220.46**−0.03
 RW2      0.03−0.040.01      0.11*−0.09**−0.01
R20.010.020.010.080.020.000.090.030.000.030.010.010.090.020.010.140.060.01
 Adjusted R2−0.010.01−0.010.050.01−0.010.040.01−0.010.010.010.000.060.010.000.090.040.00
 Δ Adjusted R2   0.06––−0.01––   0.05––0.030.03–

Note(s): Profile 1 “Challenged optimizers”, n = 79; Profile 2 “Dissatisfied reactive”, n = 256; Profile 3 “Satisfied proactive”, n = 392. For all variables we used the z-standardized scores. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. Gender: 1 = Female; 2 = Male. Children = Number of kids, with 0 indicating no kids and RW = number of remote-work days in the previous month

***p ≤ 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options