Table 7

Predictors of emotional and behavioral workaholism across profiles

Emotional workaholismBehavioral workaholism
Step 1Step 2Step 3Step 1Step 2Step 3
Profile123123123123123123
Control variablesBBBBBB
 Gender0.16−0.110.15*0.16−0.110.15*0.16−0.110.15*−0.21−0.130.21***−0.17−0.120.20***−0.17−0.120.21***
 Children0.05−0.07−0.080.05−0.08−0.080.04−0.08−0.07−0.11−0.03−0.01−0.10−0.04−0.01−0.10−0.040.01
 RW   −0.040.02−0.060.100.15−0.20   −0.24***0.11*−0.08−0.320.36*−0.23*
 RW2      −0.03−0.030.04      0.02−0.050.04
R20.030.020.030.030.020.040.030.020.040.060.020.050.110.040.050.110.050.06
 Adjusted R20.000.010.01−010.010.03−0.020.010.030.040.010.040.070.020.040.060.030.05
 Δ Adjusted R2   −0.01–0.02−0.01––   0.030.01–−0.010.010.01

Note(s): Profile 1 “Challenged optimizers”, n = 79; Profile 2 “Dissatisfied reactive”, n = 256; Profile 3 “Satisfied proactive”, n = 392. For all variables we used the z-standardized scores. Unstandardized regression coefficients are reported. Gender: 1 = Female; 2 = Male. Children = Number of kids, with 0 indicating no kids and RW = number of remote-work days in the previous month

***p ≤ 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options