Table 1.

Panel ARDL results (Misalignment_186)

Pooled mean groupMean groupDynamic fixed effects
Coef.Std. errorCoef.Std. errorCoef.Std. error
Long-run coefficients      
Mis_186−1.9618***0.47230.7001***2.7031−1.1758*0.6368
Pop0.5380***0.08600.41331.71590.4354***0.1196
HK0.4559***0.08020.77040.64200.07760.0647
INF−0.0862***0.0118−0.2322***0.0662−0.0242***0.0048
OPEN0.0138***0.00520.0846***0.0239−0.00270.0094
UN−0.0862**0.0118−1.4384**0.6247−0.00940.0404
Error-correction coefficient      
ECT (−1)−0.8789***0.0310−1.1586***0.0312−0.8456***0.0342
ΔMis186−0.66862.10874.26092.78462.2195*1.2480
ΔPop0.45521.13031.79791.9106−0.1361*0.0751
ΔHK0.48260.3827−0.15930.63690.4796***0.1044
ΔINF0.02770.02730.1274***0.04780.00150.0021
ΔOPEN0.1143***0.01780.0621***0.02580.0554***0.0119
Δ−1.7488***0.2946−0.39730.6089−1.3305***0.0973
Intercept−24.0796***1.0813−51.391644.0457−0.77773.7228
BIC9,799.679,865.459,980.21
AIC9,711.929,817.609,880.48
Observations2,5662,5662,566
Hausman test 6.25(i)
(0.3953)
8.96(ii)
(0.5698)
Note:

*, ** and ***indicate significance at 10, 5 and 1%, respectively.

aUnder the null hypothesis, PMG is more efficient estimation than MG;

bPMG is more efficient estimation than DFE under the null hypothesis. In brackets are the associated p-values

Source: Authors’ own elaboration

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal