Actors involved in the system of container terminal cluster
| Actor | Interest | Conflict | Situations and gaps that are occurring or are expected to occur | Cause of problems |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government of Indonesia | Local economic development, community welfare, and a clean environment | Economic development versus regulation compliance | There is a need for appropriate decarbonization policies to be implemented at container terminal clusters | High emission levels from container terminal activities, the obligation to use low-sulfur fuel, and economic and social aspects all must be considered |
| Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta | Local economic development, community welfare, and a clean environment | Urban development versus environmental sustainability | The air in Jakarta contains relatively high levels of Sox | Port activities, particularly the activities of ships docked at ports, generate considerable levels of emissions |
| The International Maritime Organization | Clean environment | Emissions reduction versus low-emission fuel price | Various efforts have been made to reduce emissions, but it still faces multiple obstacles | Low-sulfur fuel is more expensive, and there are costs for adapting ships to use new fuel |
| Tanjung Priok Port Authority | Port development and a clean environment | Port development versus environmental sustainability | There is a potential decrease in the volume of import and export goods | Increased costs that companies and customers must incur due to the adoption of low-sulfur fuel |
| PT Pelabuhan Indonesia or Indonesian Port Company | Affordable prices, business benefits, and port development progress | Port development versus increasing operational costs | Increased operating costs following the implementation of the low-sulfur fuel policy | Low-sulfur fuel is more expensive, and there are costs for adapting ships to new fuel |
| Container Terminal Companies | Business profit and port development | Business growth versus environmental sustainability | Each year, a new target is set for increasing the flow of containers; however, the resulting levels of emissions generated by these goals are very high | No decarbonization policy has considered the economic and social aspects, which is applied to the container terminal cluster |
| Coordinating Ministry for Maritime and Investment Affairs | Port development and a clean environment | Port development versus regulatory compliance | There is pressure to implement the latest policies, even though they generate various obstacles, especially for ports and shipping companies | Port and shipping companies must adjust to the use of low-sulfur fuel, which has the potential to increase port and shipping company expenses and shipping rates |
| Ministry of Transportation | Relations with international maritime organizations, port development progress, and a clean environment | Regulatory compliance versus shipping companies’ interests | There is increasing pressure to adopt a low-sulfur fuel policy | Port and shipping companies must adjust to the use of low-sulfur fuel, which has the potential to increase port and shipping company expenses and shipping rates |
| Pertamina | Business profit and a clean environment | Regulatory compliance versus cost competitiveness | The company succeeded in producing low-sulfur fuel by the established policy standards, but this fuel is more expensive than fuel with high sulfur content | Low-sulfur fuel is more expensive to produce, and therefore, the sale price of the product will also increase |
| Container Companies | Business profit | Global competitiveness versus regulatory compliance | Container companies experienced a significant increase in spending | The necessity of using low-sulfur fuel, which is more expensive |
| Port Workers | Clean environment and community welfare | Welfare versus high emissions produced by ports | Workers work in an environment where air pollution is high enough to endanger their health | Port activities that generate emissions, mainly from ships while in port |
| Indonesian Citizens | Affordable prices, a clean environment, and community welfare | Affordable service price versus regulatory compliance | Increased costs in the delivery and transportation of goods due to the adoption of low-sulfur fuel | The use of low-sulfur fuel results in higher prices, and therefore, container rates for fuel are applied to customers |
| Actor | Interest | Conflict | Situations and gaps that are occurring or are expected to occur | Cause of problems |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Government of Indonesia | Local economic development, community welfare, and a clean environment | Economic development versus regulation compliance | There is a need for appropriate decarbonization policies to be implemented at container terminal clusters | High emission levels from container terminal activities, the obligation to use low-sulfur fuel, and economic and social aspects all must be considered |
| Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta | Local economic development, community welfare, and a clean environment | Urban development versus environmental sustainability | The air in Jakarta contains relatively high levels of Sox | Port activities, particularly the activities of ships docked at ports, generate considerable levels of emissions |
| The International Maritime Organization | Clean environment | Emissions reduction versus low-emission fuel price | Various efforts have been made to reduce emissions, but it still faces multiple obstacles | Low-sulfur fuel is more expensive, and there are costs for adapting ships to use new fuel |
| Tanjung Priok Port Authority | Port development and a clean environment | Port development versus environmental sustainability | There is a potential decrease in the volume of import and export goods | Increased costs that companies and customers must incur due to the adoption of low-sulfur fuel |
| PT Pelabuhan Indonesia or Indonesian Port Company | Affordable prices, business benefits, and port development progress | Port development versus increasing operational costs | Increased operating costs following the implementation of the low-sulfur fuel policy | Low-sulfur fuel is more expensive, and there are costs for adapting ships to new fuel |
| Container Terminal Companies | Business profit and port development | Business growth versus environmental sustainability | Each year, a new target is set for increasing the flow of containers; however, the resulting levels of emissions generated by these goals are very high | No decarbonization policy has considered the economic and social aspects, which is applied to the container terminal cluster |
| Coordinating Ministry for Maritime and Investment Affairs | Port development and a clean environment | Port development versus regulatory compliance | There is pressure to implement the latest policies, even though they generate various obstacles, especially for ports and shipping companies | Port and shipping companies must adjust to the use of low-sulfur fuel, which has the potential to increase port and shipping company expenses and shipping rates |
| Ministry of Transportation | Relations with international maritime organizations, port development progress, and a clean environment | Regulatory compliance versus shipping companies’ interests | There is increasing pressure to adopt a low-sulfur fuel policy | Port and shipping companies must adjust to the use of low-sulfur fuel, which has the potential to increase port and shipping company expenses and shipping rates |
| Pertamina | Business profit and a clean environment | Regulatory compliance versus cost competitiveness | The company succeeded in producing low-sulfur fuel by the established policy standards, but this fuel is more expensive than fuel with high sulfur content | Low-sulfur fuel is more expensive to produce, and therefore, the sale price of the product will also increase |
| Container Companies | Business profit | Global competitiveness versus regulatory compliance | Container companies experienced a significant increase in spending | The necessity of using low-sulfur fuel, which is more expensive |
| Port Workers | Clean environment and community welfare | Welfare versus high emissions produced by ports | Workers work in an environment where air pollution is high enough to endanger their health | Port activities that generate emissions, mainly from ships while in port |
| Indonesian Citizens | Affordable prices, a clean environment, and community welfare | Affordable service price versus regulatory compliance | Increased costs in the delivery and transportation of goods due to the adoption of low-sulfur fuel | The use of low-sulfur fuel results in higher prices, and therefore, container rates for fuel are applied to customers |
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.