Table 1

Actors involved in the system of container terminal cluster

ActorInterestConflictSituations and gaps that are occurring or are expected to occurCause of problems
Government of IndonesiaLocal economic development, community welfare, and a clean environmentEconomic development versus regulation complianceThere is a need for appropriate decarbonization policies to be implemented at container terminal clustersHigh emission levels from container terminal activities, the obligation to use low-sulfur fuel, and economic and social aspects all must be considered
Provincial Government of DKI JakartaLocal economic development, community welfare, and a clean environmentUrban development versus environmental sustainabilityThe air in Jakarta contains relatively high levels of SoxPort activities, particularly the activities of ships docked at ports, generate considerable levels of emissions
The International Maritime OrganizationClean environmentEmissions reduction versus low-emission fuel priceVarious efforts have been made to reduce emissions, but it still faces multiple obstaclesLow-sulfur fuel is more expensive, and there are costs for adapting ships to use new fuel
Tanjung Priok Port AuthorityPort development and a clean environmentPort development versus environmental sustainabilityThere is a potential decrease in the volume of import and export goodsIncreased costs that companies and customers must incur due to the adoption of low-sulfur fuel
PT Pelabuhan Indonesia or Indonesian Port CompanyAffordable prices, business benefits, and port development progressPort development versus increasing operational costsIncreased operating costs following the implementation of the low-sulfur fuel policyLow-sulfur fuel is more expensive, and there are costs for adapting ships to new fuel
Container Terminal CompaniesBusiness profit and port developmentBusiness growth versus environmental sustainabilityEach year, a new target is set for increasing the flow of containers; however, the resulting levels of emissions generated by these goals are very highNo decarbonization policy has considered the economic and social aspects, which is applied to the container terminal cluster
Coordinating Ministry for Maritime and Investment AffairsPort development and a clean environmentPort development versus regulatory complianceThere is pressure to implement the latest policies, even though they generate various obstacles, especially for ports and shipping companiesPort and shipping companies must adjust to the use of low-sulfur fuel, which has the potential to increase port and shipping company expenses and shipping rates
Ministry of TransportationRelations with international maritime organizations, port development progress, and a clean environmentRegulatory compliance versus shipping companies’ interestsThere is increasing pressure to adopt a low-sulfur fuel policyPort and shipping companies must adjust to the use of low-sulfur fuel, which has the potential to increase port and shipping company expenses and shipping rates
PertaminaBusiness profit and a clean environmentRegulatory compliance versus cost competitivenessThe company succeeded in producing low-sulfur fuel by the established policy standards, but this fuel is more expensive than fuel with high sulfur contentLow-sulfur fuel is more expensive to produce, and therefore, the sale price of the product will also increase
Container CompaniesBusiness profitGlobal competitiveness versus regulatory complianceContainer companies experienced a significant increase in spendingThe necessity of using low-sulfur fuel, which is more expensive
Port WorkersClean environment and community welfareWelfare versus high emissions produced by portsWorkers work in an environment where air pollution is high enough to endanger their healthPort activities that generate emissions, mainly from ships while in port
Indonesian CitizensAffordable prices, a clean environment, and community welfareAffordable service price versus regulatory complianceIncreased costs in the delivery and transportation of goods due to the adoption of low-sulfur fuelThe use of low-sulfur fuel results in higher prices, and therefore, container rates for fuel are applied to customers

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal