Table 1.

Reviewed articles on health and safety induction training in the construction industry

NoAuthors/yearCountryJournal nameMethodologyStudy focus
1Bahn and Barratt-Pugh (2012a) AustraliaJournal of Health, Safety and EnvironmentMixed methodEvaluate the effectiveness of the construction induction training
2Tam and Fung (2012) Hong KongJournal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and PracticeMixed methodInvestigate the relationship among people’s behavior, attitude and perception toward the safety culture and evaluate the effectiveness of a mandatory safety training course
3Bahn and Barratt-Pugh (2012b) AustraliaJournal of Evaluation and Program PlanningMixed methodEvaluate the mandatory construction induction training program
4Bahn and Barratt-Pugh (2014) AustraliaInternational journal of Training ResearchMixed methodEvaluate the impact of construction induction training on work related injuries
5Alfred Goh Pui Tecka et al. (2004).MalaysiaJurnal teknologiQualitativeEvaluate criteria of safety and health induction for construction worker
6Mutwale-Ziko et al. (2017) ZambiaInternational journal of Health and Medical EngineeringMixed methodExplore the effectiveness of H&S induction practices on Zambian construction sites
7Loosemore and Malouf (2019) AustraliaSafety scienceQuantitativeExplore the impact that induction training has on worker attitude towards safety
8Harveya et al. (2020) UKJournal of Applied ErgonomicsMixed methodEvaluate the impact of actor-based H&S induction on participants and other stakeholders
9Okorie and Musonda (2020) NigeriaInternational journal of Construction ManagementMixed methodInvestigate supervisor’s ability and competency to conduct construction site H&S induction training
10Khalid et al. (2021) PakistanJournal of Applied Engineering ScienceMixed methodAssess supervisor’s capability and attitude to supervise H&S induction training
Source: Author’s own work
[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal