Table 10.

Further analysis

Variables(1)(2)
Tobin’sQt+1Cost ofdebtt+1
Retire2.194*** (9.632)0.054*** (3.486)
Retire*ΔESG0.933** (2.820)0.029* (2.154)
ΔESG0.137 (0.498)0.016 (0.900)
ROA3.134 (1.712)0.023 (0.777)
Tobin’s Q 0.001 (0.160)
Tangi0.931 (1.478)0.013 (0.898)
Grow0.472 (1.541)0.003 (0.213)
Lev0.039 (0.044)0.087** (3.031)
Size0.337** (2.324)0.000 (0.017)
Age0.058 (0.905)0.001 (0.620)
Board0.805 (1.033)0.012 (1.376)
Female0.010 (0.019)0.005 (0.220)
Indep0.063 (0.198)0.019 (1.215)
InsInvestor0.036 (0.196)0.022 (1.757)
Ar0.095*** (3.314)0.006 (1.693)
Constant1.683 (1.478)0.118** (2.784)
Observations331331
Industry FEYesYes
Year FEYesYes
Adjusted R-squared0.5280.393
Note(s):

Table 10 indicates results of the effect of the interaction term between Retire dummy and ESG disclosure on firm value and cost of debt. ESG is the natural logarithm of one plus actual ESG score as downloaded from Bloomberg. Other variables are defined as in  Appendix 1. We estimate the regression with industry and year fixed effects. The standard errors in parentheses are clustered at industry level. Continuous variables are winsorised at the 1st and 99th percentiles. *, ** and *** denote significance at the 10, 5 and 1% levels, respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal