Factors that influence choice of household’s financial management adaptation Strategies 3, 4, 6 and 9 using Bayesian multinomial logit model
| Strategy-3 | Strategy-4 | Strategy-6 | Strategy-9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.111 | 0.028 | −0.061 | −0.110 |
| Gender | −0.407* | −0.566 | −0.582 | 0.573* |
| Level of education | 0.063* | −0.081 | 0.165* | 0.122* |
| Employment status | 0.070* | 0.046 | 0.058 | −0.172* |
| Income per month | −0.027 | 0.204 | 0.060 | −0.066 |
| Income instability | 0.895* | −0.162 | 0.540 | 1.043 |
| Shrinking work opportunity | 1.623 | 0.160 | 0.503 | 0.064 |
| Number of dependents in family | −0.248 | −0.002 | 0.417* | −0.033 |
| Other’s financial contribution in family | −0.117 | −0.242 | 0.074 | −0.088 |
| Savings | −0.076 | 0.890* | 0.269 | 0.338 |
| Comparison of household expense to pre-pandemic expense | 0.047* | −0.295 | −0.156 | 0.378* |
| Major sources of expenditure | −0.143* | −0.152 | 0.123 | 0.124 |
| _cons | −4.088* | 0.415 | −4.120* | −2.615* |
| Log marginal-likelihood | −342.451 | −359.457 | −286.692 | −367.708 |
| Acceptance rate | 0.201 | 0.285 | 0.216 | 0.253 |
| Strategy-3 | Strategy-4 | Strategy-6 | Strategy-9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.111 | 0.028 | −0.061 | −0.110 |
| Gender | −0.407* | −0.566 | −0.582 | 0.573* |
| Level of education | 0.063* | −0.081 | 0.165* | 0.122* |
| Employment status | 0.070* | 0.046 | 0.058 | −0.172* |
| Income per month | −0.027 | 0.204 | 0.060 | −0.066 |
| Income instability | 0.895* | −0.162 | 0.540 | 1.043 |
| Shrinking work opportunity | 1.623 | 0.160 | 0.503 | 0.064 |
| Number of dependents in family | −0.248 | −0.002 | 0.417* | −0.033 |
| Other’s financial contribution in family | −0.117 | −0.242 | 0.074 | −0.088 |
| Savings | −0.076 | 0.890* | 0.269 | 0.338 |
| Comparison of household expense to pre-pandemic expense | 0.047* | −0.295 | −0.156 | 0.378* |
| Major sources of expenditure | −0.143* | −0.152 | 0.123 | 0.124 |
| _cons | −4.088* | 0.415 | −4.120* | −2.615* |
| Log marginal-likelihood | −342.451 | −359.457 | −286.692 | −367.708 |
| Acceptance rate | 0.201 | 0.285 | 0.216 | 0.253 |
Note(s): * denote degree of significance at 10% level
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.