Table 5. Summary of parametric analyses...

Table 5.

Summary of parametric analyses results

Model set	BLG K₀	η_IL(TX-C)	Principal stress angle reduction factor (reduction in η_IL per degree of α from vertical)	Distance between phreatic surface and toe of slope, at failure: m
Model set	BLG K₀	η_IL(TX-C)		η_IL not scaled with b	η_IL scaled with b
1	0.5	1.0	0	23	37
2	0.5	1.0	0.5	45	48
3	0.6	1.0	0	11	23
4	0.6	1.0	0.5	32	41
5	0.7	1.0	0	9	22
6	0.7	1.0	0.5	27	39
7	0.8	1.0	0	8	24
8	0.8	1.0	0.5	27	41
9	0.5	0.9	0	48	51
10	0.5	0.9	0.5	52	50
11	0.6	0.9	0	23	39
12	0.6	0.9	0.5	45	47
13	0.7	0.9	0	17	32
14	0.7	0.9	0.5	39	44
15	0.8	0.9	0	16	33
16	0.8	0.9	0.5	38	44
17	0.5	0.8	0	54	55
18	0.5	0.8	0.5	55	55
19	0.6	0.8	0	44	49
20	0.6	0.8	0.5	49	50
21	0.7	0.8	0	29	43
22	0.7	0.8	0.5	45	48
23	0.8	0.8	0	26	43
24	0.8	0.8	0.5	44	48
NorSand model 1	Varies	Ψ-dependent	0	4	—
NorSand model 2			0.5	49	—
NorSand model 3			0	—	18
NorSand model 4			0.5	—	52

Model set	BLG K₀	η_IL(TX-C)	Principal stress angle reduction factor (reduction in η_IL per degree of α from vertical)	Distance between phreatic surface and toe of slope, at failure: m
Model set	BLG K₀	η_IL(TX-C)		η_IL not scaled with b	η_IL scaled with b
1	0.5	1.0	0	23	37
2	0.5	1.0	0.5	45	48
3	0.6	1.0	0	11	23
4	0.6	1.0	0.5	32	41
5	0.7	1.0	0	9	22
6	0.7	1.0	0.5	27	39
7	0.8	1.0	0	8	24
8	0.8	1.0	0.5	27	41
9	0.5	0.9	0	48	51
10	0.5	0.9	0.5	52	50
11	0.6	0.9	0	23	39
12	0.6	0.9	0.5	45	47
13	0.7	0.9	0	17	32
14	0.7	0.9	0.5	39	44
15	0.8	0.9	0	16	33
16	0.8	0.9	0.5	38	44
17	0.5	0.8	0	54	55
18	0.5	0.8	0.5	55	55
19	0.6	0.8	0	44	49
20	0.6	0.8	0.5	49	50
21	0.7	0.8	0	29	43
22	0.7	0.8	0.5	45	48
23	0.8	0.8	0	26	43
24	0.8	0.8	0.5	44	48
NorSand model 1	Varies	Ψ-dependent	0	4	—
NorSand model 2			0.5	49	—
NorSand model 3			0	—	18
NorSand model 4			0.5	—	52

Sharing Unavailable