Table 5 Effects on endogenous variables... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5

Effects on endogenous variables

Hypothesis	Direct effect	p-value	Correlations	CI					Support	VIF	Explained variance
Hypothesis	Direct effect	p-value	Correlations	5%		95%			Support	VIF	Explained variance
H1 (+): Individual Drivers – Behavioral Intention to Use (c')	0.597	0.001	0.611	[	0.491		0.696	]	Yes	1.915	35.38% (High)
H2a (+): Individual Drivers – Attitude (a)	0.685	0.001	0.685	[	0.602		0.755	]	Yes	1.000	46.92% (High)
H2b (+): Attitude – Behavioral Intention to Use (b)	0.724	0.001	0.813	[	0.596		0.829	]	Yes	1.962	58.86% (High)
Control variables	Two-tailed bootstrapping
Sector	Direct effect 0.047	p-value 0.170^ns	t-value 1.371
Age	−0.803	0.030	2.175
Gender	0.074	0.405^ns	0.089

Hypothesis	Direct effect	p-value	Correlations	CI					Support	VIF	Explained variance
Hypothesis	Direct effect	p-value	Correlations	5%		95%			Support	VIF	Explained variance
H1 (+): Individual Drivers – Behavioral Intention to Use (c')	0.597	0.001	0.611	[	0.491		0.696	]	Yes	1.915	35.38% (High)
H2a (+): Individual Drivers – Attitude (a)	0.685	0.001	0.685	[	0.602		0.755	]	Yes	1.000	46.92% (High)
H2b (+): Attitude – Behavioral Intention to Use (b)	0.724	0.001	0.813	[	0.596		0.829	]	Yes	1.962	58.86% (High)
Control variables	Two-tailed bootstrapping
Sector	Direct effect0.047	p-value0.170^ns	t-value1.371
Age	−0.803	0.030	2.175
Gender	0.074	0.405^ns	0.089

Note(s): VIF: variance inflation factor; CI: confidence interval. ^ns: non-significant

Source(s): Authors’ own work