Least square regression analysis for urban councils
| Urban councils (n = 170) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
| C | 0.637*** (0.053) [11.988] | 0.629*** (0.053) [11.859] | 0.597*** (0.097) [6.133] |
| Community engagement | −0.057 (0.059) [−0.971] | −0.076 (0.059) [−1.281] | −0.071 (0.061) [−1.171] |
| Surplus revenue | -- | 0.012* (0.005) [2.218] | 0.012* (0.006) [2.121] |
| Current assets | -- | −0.028 (0.066) [−0.422] | −0.015 (0.074) [−0.204] |
| Cash-on-hand | -- | −0.003 (0.005) [−0.615] | −0.003 (0.005) [−0.613] |
| Expenditure on population | -- | -- | 0.000** (0.000) [0.00] |
| Expenditure on property | -- | -- | 0.000 (0.000) [0.00] |
| R2 | 0.723 | 0.733 | 0.734 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.643 | 0.648 | 0.643 |
| SE of regression | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.032 |
| F-statistic | 8.996 | 8.585 | 8.072 |
| Prob F-statistics | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Urban councils ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
| C | 0.637 | 0.629 | 0.597 |
| Community engagement | −0.057 (0.059) [−0.971] | −0.076 (0.059) [−1.281] | −0.071 (0.061) [−1.171] |
| Surplus revenue | -- | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Current assets | -- | −0.028 (0.066) [−0.422] | −0.015 (0.074) [−0.204] |
| Cash-on-hand | -- | −0.003 (0.005) [−0.615] | −0.003 (0.005) [−0.613] |
| Expenditure on population | -- | -- | 0.000 |
| Expenditure on property | -- | -- | 0.000 (0.000) [0.00] |
| 0.723 | 0.733 | 0.734 | |
| Adjusted | 0.643 | 0.648 | 0.643 |
| SE of regression | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.032 |
| F-statistic | 8.996 | 8.585 | 8.072 |
| Prob F-statistics | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Note(s):
*, ** and *** represent statistical significance at the p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 levels, respectively. Two values are reported below the estimated coefficient. The first, in parenthesis, is the standard errors and the second in brackets is the t-statistics
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.