Table 3 Hypothesis testing results Path... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Hypothesis testing results

Path	Hypotheses	VIF	Std. β	t-values	Bootstrap	Conclusions
Direct effects
CSR → JS	H1	2.23	0.17	3.07**	[0.07; 0.29]	Support
CSR →OI	H2	1.00	0.69	23.49***	[0.63; 0.74]	Support
OI → JS	H3	1.94	0.34	6.03***	[0.23; 0.46]	Support
CSR → PCF	H5	1.00	0.58	25.34***	[0.53; 0.62]	Support
PCF → JS	H6	1.53	0.23	5.19***	[0.15; 0.32]	Support
Mediating effects
CSR → OI → JS	H4		0.24	5.50***	[0.16; 0.32]	Support
CSR → PCF → JS	H7		0.13	5.10***	[0.008; 0.10]	Support
Moderating effects
AAN*CSR → OI	H8a	1.13	0.11	2.77**	[0.03; 0.18]	Support
AAN*CSR → PCF	H8b	1.13	0.13	3.09**	[0.05; 0.21]	Support
AAV*CSR → OI	H9a	1.41	−0.13	3.23**	[−0.21; −0.05]	Support
AAV*CSR → PCF	H9b	1.41	−0.10	2.69**	[−0.16; −0.02]	Support
Effect size (f²)		f²_CSR→JS = 0.02; f²_CSR→OI = 0.90; f²_OI→JS = 0.10; f²_CSR→PCF = 0.5; f²_PCF→JS = 0.06; f² _AANCSR→OI = 0.02; f² _{AANCSR→PCF} = 0.02; f² _AAVCSR→OI = 0.03; f² _{AAVCSR→PCF} = 0.01

Path	Hypotheses	VIF	Std. β	t-values	Bootstrap	Conclusions
Direct effects
CSR → JS	H1	2.23	0.17	3.07**	[0.07; 0.29]	Support
CSR →OI	H2	1.00	0.69	23.49***	[0.63; 0.74]	Support
OI → JS	H3	1.94	0.34	6.03***	[0.23; 0.46]	Support
CSR → PCF	H5	1.00	0.58	25.34***	[0.53; 0.62]	Support
PCF → JS	H6	1.53	0.23	5.19***	[0.15; 0.32]	Support
Mediating effects
CSR → OI → JS	H4		0.24	5.50***	[0.16; 0.32]	Support
CSR → PCF → JS	H7		0.13	5.10***	[0.008; 0.10]	Support
Moderating effects
AAN*CSR → OI	H8a	1.13	0.11	2.77**	[0.03; 0.18]	Support
AAN*CSR → PCF	H8b	1.13	0.13	3.09**	[0.05; 0.21]	Support
AAV*CSR → OI	H9a	1.41	−0.13	3.23**	[−0.21; −0.05]	Support
AAV*CSR → PCF	H9b	1.41	−0.10	2.69**	[−0.16; −0.02]	Support
Effect size (f²)		f²_CSR→JS = 0.02; f²_CSR→OI = 0.90; f²_OI→JS = 0.10; f²_CSR→PCF = 0.5; f²_PCF→JS = 0.06; f² _AANCSR→OI = 0.02; f² _{AANCSR→PCF} = 0.02; f² _AAVCSR→OI = 0.03; f² _{AAVCSR→PCF} = 0.01

Note(s): ***p < 0,001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05

Source(s): Authors