Table 1. Meta-analysis results for...

Table 1.

Meta-analysis results for direct relationships

Antecedent	No. of studies	Sample size	Combined effect size	Q-statistic	I²(%)	95% Upper	95% Lower	Fail-Safe no.
INT	15	4549	0.417***	235.920***	0.941	0.444	0.390	270
AUG	10	2189	0.451***	136.480***	0.934	0.494	0.406	113
CE	21	4940	0.482***	268.683***	92.6%	0.499	0.464	742
FE	7	2119	0.544***	154.643***	96.1%	0.605	0.477	66
PU	17	4918	0.547***	211.066***	92.4%	0.565	0.529	840
PEOU	16	4860	0.558***	473.135***	96.8%	0.586	0.529	335

Antecedent	No. ofstudies	Samplesize	Combinedeffect size	Q-statistic	I²(%)	95% Upper	95% Lower	Fail-Safe no.
INT	15	4549	0.417***	235.920***	0.941	0.444	0.390	270
AUG	10	2189	0.451***	136.480***	0.934	0.494	0.406	113
CE	21	4940	0.482***	268.683***	92.6%	0.499	0.464	742
FE	7	2119	0.544***	154.643***	96.1%	0.605	0.477	66
PU	17	4918	0.547***	211.066***	92.4%	0.565	0.529	840
PEOU	16	4860	0.558***	473.135***	96.8%	0.586	0.529	335

Notes:

INT = Interactivity; AUG = Augmentation; CE = Consumer Engagement; FE = Flow Experience; PU = Perceived Usefulness; PEOU = Perceived Ease of Use, Significance levels: ns (p > 0.05); *(p < 0.05); **(p < 0.01); ***(p < 0.001)

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable