Table 2

Models predicting evaluations of officer

Appropriately handlingActing reasonablyOfficer backupPossible de-escalation
Constant7.84**8.54**5.49**6.55**
(0.38)(0.25)(0.37)(0.41)
Age0.03**0.01*0.03**0.00
(0.01)(0.00)(0.00)(0.01)
Woman−0.140.060.31*−0.18
(0.15)(0.10)(0.15)(0.16)
Race – White−0.270.200.090.17
(0.17)(0.12)(0.17)(0.19)
Education−0.05−0.09−0.18*0.04
(0.09)(0.06)(0.08)(0.09)
Income−0.010.010.02−0.01
(0.02)(0.02)(0.02)(0.03)
Political Ideology−0.000.040.15**−0.09*
(0.04)(0.03)(0.04)(0.04)
Party ID – Independent−0.150.03−0.200.15
(0.21)(0.14)(0.21)(0.23)
Party ID – Republican−0.08−0.02−0.21−0.08
(0.27)(0.18)(0.27)(0.30)
T1 – Male0.010.030.150.16
(0.20)(0.13)(0.19)(0.21)
T2 – Female0.300.200.51**0.05
(0.18)(0.12)(0.17)(0.19)
Observations915915915915
R20.040.030.110.02
Adjusted R20.030.020.100.01

Note(s): *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. Standard error in parentheses; unstandardized coefficients

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal