Table 3

Results of regression analysis of associations between bonding social capital and mental well-being scales

Dependent variableEmotional well-beingPsychological well-beingSocial well-being
PredictorB95% CIB(SE)95% CIB(SE)95% CI
LLULLLULLLUL
Turkish migrants sample (n = 119)
Gender−0.08−0.340.18−0.23*−0.44−0.02−0.10−0.31−0.11
Age0.01−0.010.04−0.002−0.020.020.01−0.010.03
Health0.39***0.200.590.21**0.050.370.25**0.090.41
Partner0.19−0.060.440.23*0.020.430.10−0.110.30
Education
PBSC0.60***0.420.780.61***0.470.760.66***0.520.81
Adj. R2 = 0.45Adj. R2 = 0.53Adj. R2 = 0.53
F(5, 113) = 20.40, p <0.001F(5, 113) = 27.76, p <0.001F(5, 113) = 27.90, p <0.001
Dutch non-migrants sample (n = 123)
Dependent variableEmotional well-beingPsychological well-beingSocial well-being
PredictorB95% CIB95% CIB95% CI
LLULLLULLLUL
Gender−0.09-0.290.23−0.02−0.450.32−0.10−0.470.28
Age−0.003−0.030.020.04**−0.07−0.01−0.02−0.050.01
Health0.18*0.030.310.05−0.160.250.003−0.180.19
Partner0.12−0.200.40−0.23−0.110.76−0.26−0.630.10
Education−0.08−0.330.18−0.33−0.700.03−0.01−0.350.33
PBSC0.20**0.090.340.35***0.140.510.44***0.270.61
Adj. R2 = 0.16Adj. R2 = 0.16Adj. R2 = 0.19
F(6, 116) = 4.76, p <0.001F(6, 116) = 4.99, p <0.001F(6, 116) = 5.82, p <0.001
Dependent variableTurkish migrants sampleDutch non-migrants sample
(n = 119)(n = 122)
Overall mental well-beingOverall mental well-being
PredictorB95% CIB95% CI
LLULLLUL
Gender−0.16−0.360.03−0.10−0.440.25
Age−0.01−0.010.03−0.03*−0.01−0.001
Health0.30***0.150.440.06−0.110.23
Partner0.19−0.0010.38−0.16−0.490.17
Education−0.15−0.460.16
PBSC0.69***0.560.830.39***0.230.54
Adj. R2 = 0.62Adj. R2 = 0.22
F(5, 113) = 40.22, p <0.001F(6, 115) = 6.63, p <0.001
Note(s):

Model: Enter, *p = < 0.05, **p = < 0.01, ***p = < 0.001. Gender (0 = male, 1 = female); partner (0 = no, 1 = yes); education (0 = low, 1 = high). CI = confidence interval; LL = lower limit; UL = upper limit

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal