Future research directions
| Key findings and research gaps | Future research directions |
|---|---|
| Motivations to expatriate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adjustment processes | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Careers and gender discrimination | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Post-expatriation trajectories | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparative research | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Theories and methods | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Key findings and research gaps | Future research directions |
|---|---|
Push and pull factors are well-documented, but their interaction remains underexplored | Explore the interplay of age, cultural background, family roles, and economic status in shaping FSIEs’ motivations |
Limited exploration of how cultural and socio-economic contexts shape FSIEs’ motivations | Examine motivations of underrepresented subgroups, such as FSIEs from emerging economies or in low-status roles |
Motivations unique to FSIEs, like escaping societal pressures around motherhood or pursuing family well-being in emerging economies, require more attention | Investigate home and host country dynamics, including how socio-cultural norms influence expatriation decisions |
Evolving motivations over time, particularly among older FSIEs, are lacking deeper understanding | Conduct longitudinal studies to explore how expatriation motivations and decisions evolve in response to life stages, career progression, and host country experiences |
Adjustment challenges are underexplored in relation to gender, occupation, and cultural contexts | Investigate adjustment challenges across diverse occupations, cultural contexts, and demographic groups |
Limited research on the impact of cultural and religious contexts of home and host countries on FSIEs’ adjustment | Examine the interplay of cultural and religious factors in shaping FSIEs’ adjustment experiences |
Insufficient focus on the role of organizational support in addressing industry-specific and demographic challenges | Explore targeted organizational support initiatives, such as cross-cultural training, language programs, and diversity and inclusion management |
Career barriers shaped by cultural background, institutional norms, and appearance remain underexplored | Examine how gender, cultural background, ethnicity, and occupation influence FSIEs’ career trajectories |
Gender discrimination persists across various cultural and organizational contexts, often excluding FSIEs from male-dominated networks and decision-making roles | Explore the impact of diversity management practices, gender-sensitive mentoring programs, and inclusive workplace policies on FSIEs’ career outcomes |
Limited research on career benefits of expatriation at different life stages, particularly for older FSIEs | Investigate the long-term career impact of expatriation and the potential plateau in competency growth |
The role of organizational policies and diversity initiatives in supporting FSIEs’ career growth is underexplored | Conduct org.-level or multi-level studies to assess HRM professionals’ and managers’ perspectives on implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives to support FSIE-careers |
Theoretical frameworks used in current research lack integration to address the unique challenges faced by FSIEs, especially from emerging economies | Integrate interdisciplinary theoretical frameworks to better capture institutional and individual dynamics shaping FSIEs’ professional experiences |
Underemployment and lack of recognition for skills gained abroad often drive dissatisfaction and re-expatriation | Explore organizational support for career transitions post-repatriation |
Older FSIEs face ageism and limited access to meaningful work post-expatriation | Investigate long-term career outcomes and barriers to reintegration |
Cultural, economic, and family factors influencing reintegration are underexplored | Examine the influence of cultural, economic, and family factors on reintegration and re-expatriation |
Limited comparative research on FSIEs and female AEs, particularly regarding experiences of adjustment, career development, and gender discrimination | Compare adjustment, discrimination, and career trajectories of FSIEs and female AEs |
FSIEs face unique challenges like underemployment, while AEs benefit from organizational resources | Explore whether self-initiation reduces or exacerbates gender disparities |
Limited research directly comparing FSIEs and male SIEs | Investigate recognition of skills gained abroad and differences in repatriation experiences |
FSIEs exhibit higher adjustment levels, job satisfaction, and performance but face distinct gender discrimination | Conduct comparative studies on FSIEs and male SIEs to uncover gendered differences in experiences and expatriation outcomes |
Gender-specific challenges, like balancing motherhood or managing private-life burdens, are underexplored | Investigate how gender roles impact expatriation and repatriation challenges for FSIEs versus male SIEs |
Reliance on cross-sectional, single-report data, often derived from small sample sizes limiting generalizability | Conduct longitudinal studies capturing FSIEs’ experiences throughout expatriation stages, incorporating perspectives from supervisors, coworkers, and family |
Predominance of qualitative methods with limited empirical testing of theoretical frameworks | Rigorously apply and test established theoretical frameworks, leveraging interdisciplinary perspectives |
Underutilization of multi-level and longitudinal methodologies, leading to fragmented insights | Integrate multi-level analyses to explore the interactions between individual, organizational, and cultural factors |
Employ ethnographic and diary methods to achieve nuanced, time-sensitive insights into FSIEs’ experiences | |
Limited representation in top-tier journals, reflecting methodological and scope-related challenges | Enhance visibility in top-tier journals by adopting advanced methodologies and emphasize relevance to broader global mobility and expatriation studies |
Source(s): Authors’ own work