Table 2

Output of the moderated mediation analyses for the sustainability issue on either the dependent variable corporate reputation or legitimacy

Response strategyIssue phasebSEp95% BCa CI
Skepticism (R2 = 0.02, F(5, 355) = 1.31, p = 0.260)
X1 → skepticism  −0.9010.3970.024[−1.680, −0.122]
X2 → skepticism  0.7560.4020.061[−0.035, 1.547]
Phase → skepticism  −0.2520.1770.154[−0.600, 0.095]
X1 * Phase → skepticism  0.5080.2490.042[0.020, 0.997]
X2 * Phase → skepticism  −0.3940.2500.115[−0.886, 0.097]
Reputation (R2 = 0.31, F(3, 357) = 54.31, p < 0.001)
Skepticism → reputation  −0.7020.0560.000[−0.811, −0.592]
Direct effectX1 0.1250.1310.342[−0.133, 0.382]
X2 0.0980.1320.457[−0.161, 0.357]
Indirect effectX1Pre-problem0.2750.136[0.010, 0.553]
X1Peak−0.0810.114[−0.307, 0.145]
X2Pre-problem−0.2540.122[−0.501, −0.016]
X2Peak0.0230.120[−0.212, 0.260]
Index moderated mediationX1Index −0.36, bootSE 0.18, −0.707, −0.009]
Index moderated mediationX2Index 0.28, bootSE 0.17, [−0.057, 0.635]
Legitimacy (R2 = 0.22, F(3, 357) = 33.48, p < 0.001)
Skepticism → legitimacy  −0.6110.0620.000[−0.732, −0.490]
Direct effectX1 0.0530.1450.717[−0.233, 0.338]
X2 0.1650.1460.258[−0.122, 0.452]
Indirect effectX1Pre-problem0.2400.116[0.010, 0.469]
X1Peak−0.0710.102[−0.287, 0.114]
X2Pre-problem−0.2210.108[−0.432, −0.007]
X2Peak0.0200.106[−0.183, 0.230]
Index moderated mediationX1Index −0.31, bootSE 0.16, [−0.635, −0.011]
Index moderated mediationX2Index 0.24, bootSE 0.15, [−0.061, 0.535]

Note(s): N = 361

X1 represents the comparison between the accommodative and defensive response strategy. X2 represents the comparison between the adaptive and accommodative response strategy

Source(s): Created by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options