Overview of the groups and AI tools used in the study to enhance academic writing
| Group | Participants | Tool used | Focus areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group 1 | 68 | Grammarly | Clarity, precision, argumentation, academic standards |
| Experimental Group 2 | 65 | ProWritingAid | Clarity, precision, language mastery, argumentation, academic norms |
| Experimental Group 3 | 64 | Hemingway Editor | Readability, simplicity, clarity, sentence construction, formal tone |
| Experimental Group 4 | 65 | Quillbot | Clarity, vocabulary diversity, argumentation, academic integrity |
| Experimental Group 5 | 68 | Writefull | Clarity, precision, discipline-specific terminology, argumentation |
| Experimental Group 6 | 68 | Turnitin Revision Assistant | Clarity, vocabulary, argument coherence, citation guidance |
| Control Group (Group 7) | 68 | Regular CALL Course | Baseline for comparative analysis |
| Group | Participants | Tool used | Focus areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group 1 | 68 | Grammarly | Clarity, precision, argumentation, academic standards |
| Experimental Group 2 | 65 | ProWritingAid | Clarity, precision, language mastery, argumentation, academic norms |
| Experimental Group 3 | 64 | Hemingway Editor | Readability, simplicity, clarity, sentence construction, formal tone |
| Experimental Group 4 | 65 | Quillbot | Clarity, vocabulary diversity, argumentation, academic integrity |
| Experimental Group 5 | 68 | Writefull | Clarity, precision, discipline-specific terminology, argumentation |
| Experimental Group 6 | 68 | Turnitin Revision Assistant | Clarity, vocabulary, argument coherence, citation guidance |
| Control Group (Group 7) | 68 | Regular CALL Course | Baseline for comparative analysis |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.