Table 3

Study 2 construct reliability and convergent validity

Constructs and their itemsStudy 1
LoadsαCRAVE
Intention to Use 0.9550.9650.846
1. I will use the humanoid social robot to search for information on products0.899   
2. I will use the humanoid social robot to select my products at the store0.896   
3. I intend to use the humanoid social robot to proceed with my purchase at the store0.946   
4. I plan to use the humanoid social robot in the future0.926   
5. I will use the humanoid social robot at this store to make a purchase0.933   
Realistic Threat 0.6480.9320.587
1. The increased use of humanoid social robots in our everyday life is causing more job losses for humans0.721   
2. In the long run, humanoid social robots pose a direct threat to human safety and wellbeing0.766   
3. I would feel very nervous just standing in front of a humanoid social robot0.810   
Speciesism 0.8540.8940.584
1. Morally, animals always count for less than humans0.770   
2. Humans have the right to use animals however they want to0.778   
3. It is morally acceptable to keep animals in circuses for human entertainment0.666   
4. It is morally acceptable to trade animals like possessions0.812   
5. Chimpanzees should not have basic legal rights such as a right to life or a prohibition of torture0.727   
6. It is morally acceptable to perform medical experiments on animals that we would not perform on any human0.824   

Note(s): All items have high loadings. Criteria: Cronbach’s α > 0.70 (Nunnally and Bernstein, 1994), Composite Reliability (CR) > 0.70 and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) > 0.50 (Hair et al., 2010)

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options