Summary of hypotheses and findings
| Studies | Hypotheses | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | H1: Customers will perceive higher levels of threat when HSRs have a supervisor (vs. assistant) role, which in turn reduces customers’ intention to use HSRs | H1 supported |
| Study 2 | H2: The negative indirect effect of realistic threat on consumers’ intentions to use HSR (H1) is negatively moderated by speciesism, such that this effect becomes stronger with higher levels of speciesism | H1 supported H2 supported |
| Study 3 | H3: The effect of master-servant relationships on customers’ intention to use HSRs is mediated by trust (H3a) such that customers’ perceived trust is higher when the HSR has a servant (vs. master) role, which leads to higher intentions to use HSRs. However, this effect is positively moderated by speciesism (H3b), such that this effect becomes stronger with higher levels of speciesism | H3 supported H3a supported H3b supported |
| Study 4 | H4: The effect of master-servant HSR roles on intentions to use HSRs is sequentially mediated by realistic threat and trust, such that supervisor (vs. assistant) HSRs increase perceived threat and reduce perceived trust, which subsequently reduces customers’ intention to use HSRs. However, the sequential mediation effect becomes stronger with higher levels of speciesism | H4 supported |
| Studies | Hypotheses | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | ||
| Study 2 | ||
| Study 3 | ||
| Study 4 |
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.