Table 3

Results for the test of mediation between coercive pressures and TBL sustainability

Model 1Model 2Model 3
Economic sustainabSocial sustainabilityEnvironmental sustainab
VariablesPathsβ (se)p-valueβ (se)p-valueβ (se)p-value
Coercive pressures (X)a1, a2, a30.546 (0.083)0.0000.546 (0.083)0.0000.546 (0.083)0.000
Corporate strategy (M)b1, b2, b30.057 (0.041)0.1720.070 (0.035)0.0500.101 (0.037)0.006
Coercive pressures (direct effect)c`1, c`1, c`10.459 (0.054)0.0000.241 (0.047)0.0000.447 (0.048)0.000
Coercive pressures (total effect)c1, c2, c30.491 (0.049)0.0000.280 (0.043)0.0000.502 (0.044)0.000
SizeU10.006 (0.003)0.077−0.000 (0.000)0.195−0.000 (0.000)0.003
TenureU2−0.000 (0.000)0.184−0.000 (0.003)0.9610.005 (0.003)0.145
R2 0.3470.1860.436
F 28.3012.74**40.70**
Note(s): **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05
Bootstrap for indirect effects
DataBootBiasSEBias corrected CI
LowerUpper
Corporate strategy (Model 1)0.0310.0320.0010.025−0.0170.083
Corporate strategy (Model 2)0.0380.0400.0020.027−0.0060.101
Corporate strategy (Model 3)0.0550.0570.0020.0230.0130.104

Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options