Table 2

Correlation matrix

AgeDegreeGenderField of studyGeneral ideas over lifetimeLLM_SkillAtS_ScoreORC_EGCG noGPT_SAORC_EG withGPT_SAORC_EGCG noGPT_ExpORC_EG
WithGPT_Exp
AgePearson correlation          
DegreePearson correlation0.241         
Sig. (2-sided)0.145          
GenderPearson correlation−0.285−0.315        
Sig. (2-sided)0.0830.054         
Field of StudyPearson correlation−0.1390.472**0.031       
Sig. (2-sided)0.4040.0030.854        
General Ideas over LifetimePearson correlation0.029−0.416**0.013−0.274      
Sig. (2-sided)0.8640.0090.9400.096       
LLM SkillPearson correlation0.0590.197−0.085−0.0570.215     
Sig. (2-sided)0.7230.2360.6120.7340.195      
AtS ScorePearson correlation0.107−0.0570.230−0.036−0.146−0.469**    
Sig. (2-sided)0.5220.7320.1650.8320.3830.003     
ORC_EGCG noGPT_SAPearson correlation0.281−0.063−0.142−0.1330.2300.0940.224   
Sig. (2-sided)0.0880.7060.3960.4250.1640.5750.177    
ORC_EG withGPT_SAPearson correlation−0.1230.0230.0920.1010.1580.374*−0.2200.105  
Sig. (2-sided)0.4620.8910.5840.5450.3440.0210.1850.532   
ORC_EGCG noGPT_ExpPearson correlation0.052−0.348*−0.128−0.2710.730**−0.0210.0880.061−0.096 
Sig. (2-sided)0.7570.0320.4430.100<0.0010.8990.6010.7140.567  
ORC_EG
WithGPT_Exp
Pearson correlation−0.1930.0600.1330.1420.1750.157−0.531**−0.1540.0410.199
Sig. (2-sided)0.2460.7200.4250.3960.2950.346<0.0010.3570.8050.231 

Note(s): Measurement Items:

AtS Score: Attitude towards Sustainability

ORC_EGCG_noGPT_SA: Opportunity Recognition capability of Experimental Group and Control Group in task without LLM, support measured by Self Evaluation

ORC_EG_withGPT_SA: Opportunity Recognition capability of Experimental Group in task with LLM support, measured by Self Evaluation

ORC_EGCG_noGPT_Exp: Opportunity Recognition capability of Experimental Group and Control Group in task without LLM support, measured by Expert Evaluation

ORC_EG_withGPT_Exp: Opportunity Recognition capability of Experimental Group in task with LLM support, measured by Expert Evaluation

**. The correlation is significant at a level of 0.01 (2-sided)

*. The correlation is significant at a level of 0.05 (2-sided)

Source(s): Table created by authors based on collected data

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal