Table A3

Discriminant validity: Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio (HTMT.90 and HTMTInference)

Brand loveBrand love Brand commitmentBrand love Brand intimacyBrand love Brand passionBrand engagementBrand valueCOBRA contributionCOBRA consumption
Brand love Brand intimacy 0.854
CI[0.762; 0.928]
      
Brand love Brand passion 0.919
CI[0.860; 0.969]
0.895
CI[0.822; 0.946]
     
Brand engagement0.776
CI[0.677; 0.845]
0.733
CI[0.619; 0.826]
0.769
CI[0.677; 0.837]
0.725
CI[0.614; 0.808]
    
Brand value0.794
CI[0.696; 0.867]
0.774
CI[0.667; 0.864]
0.732
CI[0.619; 0.822]
0.780
CI[0.679; 0.855]
0.881
CI[0.825; 0.825]
   
COBRA0.770
CI[0.697; 0.827]
0.662
CI[0.563; 0.743]
0.808
CI[0.741; 0.862]
0.716
CI[0.628; 0.789]
0.744
CI[0.666; 0.805]
0.675
CI[0.567; 0.756]
  
COBRA contribution0.800
CI[0.729; 0.855]
0.713
CI[0.616; 0.789]
0.816
CI[0.747; 0.873]
0.752
CI[0.667; 0.819]
0.780
CI[0.703; 0.838]
0.708
CI[0.605; 0.788]
  
COBRA consumption0.726
CI[0.645; 0.797]
0.650
CI[0.543; 0.742]
0.756
CI[0.675; 0.823]
0.664
CI[0.677; 0.845]
0.703
CI[0.564; 0.749]
0.636
CI[0.524; 0.728]
0.963
CI[0.935; 0.84
 
COBRA creation0.715
CI[0.636; 0.781]
0.570
CI[0.465; 0.662]
0.777
CI[0.703; 0.839]
0.667
CI[0.574; 0.747]
0.682
CI[0.596; 0.751]
0.621
CI[0.512; 0.707]
0.923
CI[0.880; 0.955]
0.878
CI[0.815; 0.922]

Note(s): Fornell-Larcker Criterion: Diagonal elements (italic) are the square root of the variance shared between the constructs and their measures (AVE: average variance extracted). Off-diagonal are the correlations among constructs. For discriminant validity, diagonal elements should be larger than off-diagonal elements. HTMT ratio: the three results marked in italic indicate discriminant problems according to the HTMT.90 criterion. HTMTinference does not indicate discriminant validity problems

Source(s): Own elaboration

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal