Figure 4
The diagram contains several nodes positioned in four quadrants. The nodes and their locations are: The node in the top left quadrant is labeled “imagined dot identity.” The nodes in the top right quadrant are labeled “identification,” “negotiating dot language dot tension,” and “feeling dot not dot good dot enough.” The quote in the top left quadrant reads as follows: “Imagined notion of “real” context.” The node in the bottom left quadrant is labeled “feeling dot ashamed.” The node in the bottom right quadrant is labeled “feeling dot inferior.” The quote in the bottom left quadrant reads as follows: ““Real” context versus books or instructional activities.” The quote in the bottom right quadrant reads as follows: “Traveling to a “real” context.” The connections between the nodes are as follows: A line labeled “[1]” from “feeling dot ashamed” leads to “feeling dot inferior.” A line labeled “[2]” from “imagined dot identity” leads to “feeling dot inferior.” A line labeled “[3]” from “negotiating dot language dot tensions” leads to “feeling dot inferior.” Three thin lines from “imagined dot identity” lead to “negotiating dot language dot tension,” “feeling dot not dot good dot enough,” and “feeling dot ashamed.” Two thin lines from “negotiating dot language tension” lead to “feeling dot ashamed” and “feeling dot not dot good dot enough.” A thin line from “feeling dot not dot good dot enough” leads to “feeling dot ashamed.”Gaby’s discourse network for the past temporality. Source. Figure by author