Figure 5
The diagram contains several nodes positioned in four quadrants. The nodes and their locations are as follows: The node in the top left quadrant is labeled “imagined dot identity.” The nodes in the top right quadrant are labeled “identification,” “negotiating dot language dot tension,” and “feeling dot not dot good dot enough.” The quote in the top left quadrant reads as follows: “I would never say that I’m 100 percent a good English teacher, […] I feel I still have a lot to learn.” The quote in the top right quadrant reads as follows: “I’m happy with where I am right now.” The node in the bottom left quadrant is labeled “feeling dot ashamed.” The node in the bottom right quadrant is labeled “feeling dot inferior.” The connections between the nodes are as follows: A line labeled “[1]” from “imagined dot identity” leads to “feeling dot inferior.” A line labeled “[2]” from “negotiating dot language dot tension” leads to “feeling dot inferior.” A line from “negotiating dot language dot tensions” leads to “feeling dot not dot good dot enough.” Five thin lines from “identification” lead to “imagined dot identity,” “negotiating dot language dot tensions,” “feeling dot not dot good dot enough,” “feeling dot inferior,” and “feeling dot ashamed.” Two thin lines from “imagined dot identity” lead to “feeling dot ashamed” and “feeling dot inferior.” A thin line from “negotiating dot language dot tensions” leads to “feeling dot ashamed.” Two thin lines from “feeling dot not dot good dot enough” lead to “feeling dot ashamed” and “feeling dot inferior.” A thin line from “feeling dot ashamed” leads to “feeling dot inferior.”Gaby’s discourse network for the present temporality. Source. Figure by author