Figure 5
The diagram shows six pie charts arranged in a 3 by 2 grid. The first chart on the top row is labeled “(a)” and includes two pie charts. The data from the left chart in the clockwise sense are as follows: “M O G A”: 50 percent. “M O L P”: 9 percent. “Other”: 23 percent. “Linear regression”: 4 percent. “M O P S O”: 14 percent. The data from the right chart in the clockwise sense are as follows: “A N N”: 14 percent. “F C M -E L M”: 5 percent. “G P R”: 4 percent. The second chart on the top row, labeled “(b)”, has the following data in the clockwise sense: “E N”: 50 percent. “I S O”: 25 percent. “S E T A C E L C C”: 7 percent. “S B C 602”: 6 percent. “Eco-indicator 99 (E I 99)”: 6 percent. “Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society ellipsis”: 6 percent. The third chart on the top row, labeled “(c)”, contains the following data in the clockwise sense: “Architectural or spatial design”: 32 percent. “Envelope”: 50 percent. “Building services”: 18 percent. The first chart on the bottom row, labeled “(d)”, has the following values in the clockwise sense: “EnergyPlus”: 61 percent. “DesignBuilder”: 16 percent. “I D A I C E”: 5 percent. “Ecotect”: 6 percent. “eQUEST”: 6 percent. “Green Building Studio”: 6 percent. The second chart on the bottom row, labeled “(e)”, contains the following data in the clockwise sense: “Solid waste”: 3 percent. “Water use”: 3 percent. “T E C”: 16 percent. “T E D S C”: 3 percent. “E E D L”: 3 percent. “D H”: 5 percent. “L C A”: 8 percent. “L C C”: 35 percent. “L C C F”: 24 percent. The third chart on the bottom row, labeled “(f)”, has the following values in the clockwise sense: “Residential”: 53 percent. “Office”: 35 percent. “Institutional”: 12 percent.Distribution of the collected data based on (a) different optimisation methods, (b) life cycle performance standards, (c) building's function, (d) type of the design variables, (e) energy simulation engines, (f) objective functions. Source: The authors