Figure 3
The diagram is horizontally oriented, featuring rectangular boxes and multiple directional arrows. On the far left, a rectangle labeled “Demand articulation” is positioned. To its immediate right, another rectangle labeled “Supplier responsiveness” contains two bullet points: “Supplier size” and “Absorptive capacity.” An arrow points right from “Demand articulation” to “Supplier responsiveness,” labeled above with three vertically stacked labels: “P 1 a (positive),” “P 1 b (positive),” and “P 1 c (positive).” Another arrow points left from “Supplier responsiveness” back to “Demand articulation,” and above this arrow, three stacked labels appear: “P 2.1 a (positive),” “P 2.2 a (negative),” and “P 2.3 (positive).” Above “Supplier responsiveness,” slightly to the right, sits a rectangle labeled “Network complexity” with two bullet points: “Interconnectedness” and “Resource accessibility.” An arrow from the central box “Supplier responsiveness” connects to the top box “Network complexity” and is labeled “P 3 a (positive),” “P 3 b (positive),” and “P 3 c (negative).” To the right of “Supplier responsiveness,” two rectangles align horizontally: “Incremental innovation” above “Radical innovation.” Arrows extend from “Supplier responsiveness” to each: to “Incremental innovation,” labeled above as “P 2.2 b (positive)” and below as “P 3.2 b (positive),” “P 2.1 b (positive),” and “P 2.2 c (negative)” to “Radical innovation.” Two arrows extend downward from “Network complexity.” One arrow meets the arrow connecting the upper-right box “Incremental innovation” from the central box and is labeled “P 3.1 a (positive)” and “P 3.2 b (positive),” and another arrow meets the arrow connecting the lower-right box “Radical innovation,” which is labeled “P 3.2 b (positive).”Conceptual relationship of the SCIP framework. Source: Authors’ construct based on authors’ own elaboration