Figure 3
The path diagram includes two circles: “Systems’ Caused O R” on the left and “Operational Performance” on the right. The circle labeled “Systems’ Caused O R” is connected to four rectangles arranged diagonally on the left labeled from top to bottom as “S O R 1,” “S O R 2,” “S O R 3,” and “S O R 4”. Each rectangle links to the circle with leftward arrows showing the respective path coefficients: 0.703 (0.000) for “S O R 1,” 0.774 (0.000) for “S O R 2,” 0.863 (0.000) for “S O R 3,” and 0.774 (0.000) for “S O R 4”. The circle labeled “Operational Performance,” having a value of 0.481, is connected to six vertically arranged rectangles on the right labeled from top to bottom as “O P 1,” “O P 2,” “O P 3,” “O P 4,” “O P 5,” and “O P 6”. Each rectangle links with leftward arrow and connects to the circle labeled “Operational Performance,” showing the respective path coefficients: “negative 0.050 (0.500)” from “O P 1,” 0.018 (0.798) from “O P 2,” “negative 0.117 (0.064)” from “O P 3,” 0.409 (0.005) from “O P 4,” 0.587 (0.000) from “O P 5,” and 0.133 (0.054) from “O P 6”. A horizontal arrow connects “Systems’ Caused O R” to “Operational Performance,” labeled with a path coefficient of 0.694 (0.000).Path analysis of the association among systems caused by ORS and operational performance. Source: Smart PLS Graphic Output