The figure shows four bar graphs arranged in a vertical series. In all four graphs, the horizontal axis is labeled “Timestep” and ranges from negative 0.5 to 2.5 in increments of 0.5 units. All the graphs show three vertical bars. The first bar graph at the top is labeled “Integrated Gradients – Hamad Port”. The vertical axis is labeled “Attribution Score” and ranges from 0 to 0.02 in increments of 0.01 units. The data for the three bars are as follows: For timestep 0, attribution score: 0.015. For timestep 1, attribution score: 0.010. For timestep 2, attribution score: 0.021. The second bar graph below it is labeled “Integrated Gradients – Jeddah Port”. The vertical axis is labeled “Attribution Score” and ranges from 0 to 0.02 in increments of 0.01 units. The data for the three bars are as follows: For timestep 0, attribution score: 0.020. For timestep 1, attribution score: 0.021. For timestep 2, attribution score: 0.008. The third bar graph below that is labeled “Integrated Gradients – Salalah Port”. The vertical axis is labeled “Attribution Score” and ranges from 0 to 0.05 in increments of 0.025 units. The data for the three bars are as follows: For timestep 0, attribution score: 0.035. For timestep 1, attribution score: 0.030. For timestep 2, attribution score: 0.060. The fourth bar graph at the bottom is labeled “Integrated Gradients – Shuwaikh Port”. The vertical axis is labeled “Attribution Score” and ranges from 0 to 0.02 in increments of 0.01 units. The data for the three bars are as follows: For timestep 0, attribution score: 0.012. For timestep 1, attribution score: 0.009. For timestep 2, attribution score: 0.029. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Integrated gradients attribution scores per input timestep in the LSTM model
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.