Figure 1
The model is enclosed within a large dashed rectangular frame labeled “Dynamic Capabilities Theory”. Inside this frame, a smaller dashed rectangle at the top is labeled “Institutional Theory”. Within this smaller box, there are two horizontally arranged ovals: the left oval labeled “Government institutional support” and the right oval labeled “Government regulatory intervention”. Beneath these two ovals, the notation “H 5 a, b, c” appears under the left one, and “H 6 a, b, c” appears under the right one. From both of these institutional factors, several diagonal dashed arrows extend downward in different directions toward the main model elements below. Below this institutional layer, the main structural model shows three horizontally arranged ovals: “A I capabilities” on the left, “Sustainable competitiveness” on the right, and “Organisational resilience” centered below them. A solid horizontal arrow labeled “H 1” connects “A I capabilities” to “Sustainable competitiveness”. A solid diagonal arrow labeled “H 2” goes downward from “A I capabilities” to “Organisational resilience”. A solid diagonal arrow labeled “H 3” leads upward from “Organisational resilience” to “Sustainable competitiveness”. The dashed arrows originating from “Government institutional support” and “Government regulatory intervention” each point toward these same three pathways, reinforcing that institutional factors influence the hypothesized relationships. At the bottom of the diagram, a textual hypothesis is written as “H 4: A I capabilities to Organisational resilience to Sustainable competitiveness”, indicating a mediated relationship through organisational resilience.Conceptual framework. Source(s): Authors’ own work