Figure 5
Graph 1: The horizontal axis has markings ranging from 0 to 1 in increments of 0.2 units. The vertical axis is labeled “Effects on linear prediction of performance” and has markings ranging from negative 8 to 2 in increments of 2 units. A dashed horizontal line is drawn from 0 on the vertical axis. The graph shows a solid line and two dashed lines. The solid line starts from (0.02, 1.7), slopes downward diagonally, and terminates at (1, negative 4.7). The first dashed line starts from (0.02, 2.49), slopes concave up, and terminates at (1, negative 1.32). The second dashed line starts from (0.02, 0.94), slopes concave down, and terminates at (1, negative 8.14). Graph 2: The horizontal axis is labeled “H H I” and has markings ranging from 0 to 1 in increments of 0.2 units. The vertical axis is labeled “Kernel dens.” and has markings ranging from 0 to 10 in increments of 10 units. The graph shows a curve that starts from (0.02, 0), rises upward to (0.04, 9.08), slopes down passing through (0.1, 3.59), (0.14, 3.77), and terminates at (0.43, 0). The region below the curve is shaded. Note: All numerical data values are approximated.Conditional marginal effects in the dimension of industry competitive intensity. Source: Authors’ own work