Figure 14
The figure is arranged in two rows and three columns, comparing results from three modeling approaches labeled at the top as “Full fidelity result”, “Lightweight model informed”, and “Standard homogenization”. Each column corresponds to one approach. The top row, labeled “(a). Part Von-mises stress distribution of structure 27” shows color contour maps of Von Mises stress. Each map includes a vertical color bar on the right with units noted as “Megapascals”. In the full fidelity result, the stress field appears highly detailed, with complex curved patterns and multiple localized high-stress regions highlighted by dashed red circles. The color scale ranges from low values in blue (35.39) to high values in yellow and red (370.20). In the lightweight model informed result, the stress distribution is smoother and more averaged but still shows concentrated high-stress zones at locations corresponding to the full fidelity result, also marked by dashed red circles. The color scale ranges from 15.91 to 20.08. In the standard homogenization result, the stress field is even smoother, with fewer spatial details and broader stress regions, while still indicating similar general locations of higher stress. The color scale ranges from 10.42 to 19.08. The bottom row, labeled “(b). Part strain distribution of structure 27,” shows corresponding strain contour maps. Each plot includes a vertical color bar with values expressed as percentages, ranging approximately from about 0.87 percent for the left plot and 0.89 percent for the other two plots to 1.00 percent. The full fidelity strain map shows fine-scale variations and detailed patterns across the structure. The lightweight model-informed strain map presents smoother contours that retain the main strain concentration regions seen in the full fidelity case. The standard homogenization strain map is the smoothest, with reduced local variation and more uniform strain regions.Comparison of stress and strain distributions in (left panel) the detailed heterogeneous model and (right panel) the homogenized model. The heterogeneous model exhibits localized variations due to fiber–matrix interfaces, while the homogenized model displays a smooth distribution consistent with the effective material properties