Figure 1.
A large structured diagram presents a framework organised into multiple sections with headings, boxes, and arrows. Along the left side, vertical labels read Measures, Outcomes, Corporate Social Response Mechanisms, and Corporate Social Responsibility Principles. Across the top, a row of boxes lists Degree of motivation resultant from C S R principles, Degree of social response mechanism usage, Existence and quality of social policies and programmes, and Social impacts of actions, policies, and programmes, grouped under the heading Social Impact, Social Programmes and Social Policies. The central area is divided into three vertical columns labelled Phase, Drivers, and Instruments. Under Phase, stacked boxes read Corporate Social Stewardship, Corporate Social Responsiveness, Corporate Business Ethics, Corporate Global Citizenship, and C S R S toward a Millennial Future. Under Drivers, boxes list Executive conscience, Company image, Public relations, Social unrest, Corporate misbehaviour, Public policy and government regulation, Stakeholder pressure, Religio ethical beliefs, Technology driven value changes, Human rights advocacy, Global economic trade, Digital communication networks, Geopolitical shifts competition, Ecological awareness concerns, N G O pressures, Sustainability processes, Generational changes, and Religion metaphysical beliefs. Under Instruments, boxes list Philanthropic funding, Company grants, Charitable foundation grants, Stakeholder strategy, Regulatory compliance, Social audits, Public affairs function, Mission vision values statements, C E O leadership ethics, Code of ethics, Social audits, Intergovernmental compacts, Human welfare rights, Supply chain labour conditions, Ecological sustainability, Global codes, Indeterminate speculative, Awaits mindfulness, and Maturity and control of corporate policies. At the bottom, three adjacent boxes are labelled Principle of Legitimacy application level institutional, Principle of Public Responsibility application level organisational, and Principle of Professional Discretion application level multiple. Below these, four horizontal dark bars contain questions reading What if discretion components matter in the professional context, What if discretion levels matter in the professional context, What if discretion range matters in the professional context, and What if goal discretion matters in the professional context. To the right of these bars, a vertical column of boxes is labelled Components, Levels, Range, and Goals.CSR–CSP–professional–discretion conceptual framework