Figure 2.
The figure displays overlapping circles representing variables: J I for job insecurity, U O R for usage of robots, P O S for perceived organisational support, J S for job satisfaction, and T D O for training and development opportunities. The overlapping regions indicate different interaction combinations leading to turnover intention, denoted as T I. The relationships are summarised as five terms: T1 equals J I and not P O S, T2 equals U O R and J I, T3 equals J I and T D O, T4 equals not P O S and not J S and not T D O, and T5 equals U O R and not P O S and not J S. A single arrow points towards T I, representing a high level of turnover intention, demonstrating that reduced organisational support and satisfaction combined with job insecurity drive employee turnover.Configurational model
Note(s):TI = turnover intention; JI = job insecurity; UOR = the usage of robots; POS = perceived organizational support; JS = job satisfaction; TDO = training and development opportunities; “∼” indicates negation
Source: Authors’ own creation