Figure 4
The figure shows the sensitivity analysis plot illustrating how the rankings of alternatives change under different weight scenarios. On the left vertical side, the alternatives are listed from bottom to top as labeled “R 1”, “R 2”, “R 3”, “R 4”, “R 5”, “R 6”, “R 7”, “R 8”, “R 9”, “R 10”, “R 11”, “R 12”, “R 13”, “R 14”, “R 15”, “R 16”, “R 17”, “R 18”, “R 19, “R 20”, “R 21”, “R 22”, “R 23”, and “R 24”. Each alternative is represented by a smooth, colored line that runs horizontally across the figure. Along the bottom horizontal axis, the stages are labeled from left to right as “Key Roal”, “Normal”, “0.1”, “0.2”, “0.3”, “0.4”, and “0.5”. Vertical grid lines separate each labeled stage. The vertical scale for “Normal” is labeled “1”, “9”, “10”, “15”, “20”, and “24” from bottom to top. At the “Key Roal”, position on the far left, the colored lines begin at different rank levels corresponding to the initial ranking of R 1 through R 24. Moving to the “Normal” position, many lines cross sharply, indicating major changes in rank ordering. As the values progress through “0.1”, “0.2”, “0.3”, “0.4”, and “0.5”, the colored lines rise and fall smoothly, showing how each alternative’s rank shifts under different scenarios. Some alternatives remain relatively stable across all stages, while others show significant upward or downward movement, with multiple line crossings visible between stages.Sensitivity analysis